Universidad Autonóma de Querétaro - UAQ vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad Panamericana vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 49 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Anáhuac (4.60)
Universidad Autonóma de Querétaro - UAQ: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad Panamericana: wins 1/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad Mondragón México: wins 0/7 categories
Instituto Dicormo: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Law LLB
Cancun, Mexico
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
33 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication
Aguascalientes, Mexico
4.10
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Santiago de Queretaro, Mexico
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Santiago de Queretaro, Mexico
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
2.80
4.50
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.40
4.50
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.41
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
1.95
4.59
Win
3.33
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.45
4.63
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.45
4.63
Win
4.33
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
0.95
4.66
Win
3.75
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive teachers and engaging programs
  • +Vibrant student community and campus atmosphere
  • +Opportunities for independent learning and growth
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities
  • +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
  • +Strong business programs and professional connections
  • +Personalized attention and strong sense of community

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of clear communication and support
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
  • -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
  • -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
  • -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

A nuanced picture emerges from these university ratings, with **Location** standing out as a significant strength at 4.4. **Professors** also received a commendable score of 4. In stark contrast, **Accomodation** presents a considerable challenge, rating a low 0.95. **Internationality** also appears to be an area needing attention, scoring 1.95. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise excellent programs, friendly teachers, and a great student vibe. They also highlight program rankings and opportunities for personalized learning.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
67%
33%
0%
50%
0%
0%
4★
100%
39%
58%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
8%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close