Universidad de Panamá - UP vs Universidad Tecnológica de Panamá - UTP vs Universidad Católica Santa María La Antigua - USMA vs Universidad Latina de Panamá - ULAT vs Universidad Interamericana de Panamá - UIP

Side-by-side comparison from 10 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad de Panamá - UP: wins 1/1 categories
Universidad Tecnológica de Panamá - UTP: wins 0/1 categories
Universidad Católica Santa María La Antigua - USMA: wins 0/1 categories
Universidad Latina de Panamá - ULAT: wins 0/1 categories
Universidad Interamericana de Panamá - UIP: wins 0/1 categories
Instituto Técnico Superior Especializado: wins 0/1 categories
International Maritime University of Panama - UMIP: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Ciudad de Panama, Panama
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Graphic Design
Best programme: Business Administration and Information Systems Management
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: Business Administration and International Relations
Best programme: Environmental Management with Business
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.33
5.00
2.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
Win
4.67
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
5.00
4.67
5.00
3.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
3.33
5.00
3.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.00
4.67
5.00
2.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.00
4.33
5.00
3.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
3.67
4.00
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive professors and career guidance
  • +Website and administrative support issues
  • +Limited campus life vibrancy
  • +Academic excellence and personal development
  • +Tools for success in the modern world
  • +Fostering self-taught learning and critical thinking
  • +Varied internship opportunities and career guidance
  • +State-of-the-art facilities and passionate faculty
  • +Commitment to accommodating diverse lifestyles
  • +High-quality professors
  • +Collaborative learning environment
  • +Challenging administrative processes
  • +Supportive administration and teachers
  • +Long-term alumni support

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of student support and clear communication is a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Excessive workload and lack of support.
  • -Ineffective teaching and unclear expectations.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
  • -Lack of professor engagement and support hinders learning.
  • -Scheduling conflicts and unreliable information are frequent frustrations.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities and resources are often outdated or insufficient.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are frequently criticized as ineffective.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives excellent marks for its Professors and Location, both scoring a perfect 5. Facilities and Accomodation are also strong, with ratings of 4. Student Life, Internationality, and Value are identified as areas with more moderate scores, all receiving a 3.

This institution receives high marks for its professors, location, and student life, all scoring an impressive 4.67. Facilities and value are also strong, averaging 4.33. The university's weakest areas lie in accommodation and internationality, with ratings of 3.67 and 3.33 respectively, suggesting room for improvement in these specific aspects.

Overall, this institution garners exceptional ratings, particularly excelling in Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Internationality, all achieving a perfect score. Accommodations and Location are also strong points, each receiving a commendable 4 out of 5. The university also scores a perfect 5 for Value, indicating a highly positive overall assessment.

Among the surveyed categories, the university particularly excels in its **Location**, receiving a high score of 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as a significant weakness, with a rating of just 1. Ratings for Professors, Internationality, and Value are moderate at 3. Facilities and Student Life both received lower marks of 2.

This institution shines with perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value. These areas represent its strongest offerings, suggesting a well-rounded and high-quality educational experience. However, significant weaknesses are evident in Location and Accommodation, which received no points, indicating potential drawbacks in these crucial aspects for students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is largely positive. One student highlighted a good professor and career support, but noted a less lively campus and unhelpful administration with website issues.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight academic excellence, personal development, and preparation for the modern world.

With two positive reviews and an average rating of 5/5, students praise varied internship opportunities, helpful workshops, state-of-the-art classrooms, and distinguished faculty. The university is also noted for its commitment to accommodating diverse lifestyles.

With an average rating of 3.33/5, ~67% of reviews are positive, praising professors and learning potential. ~33% of feedback expresses dissatisfaction with administrative processes, lack of automation, and unhelpful staff.

With a 5/5 average rating from one review, students highlight the supportive administration and teachers. This singular positive experience suggests a focus on student improvement and post-graduation assistance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
67%
100%
33%
100%
0%
0%
4★
100%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close