Egas Moniz Cooperative of Higher Education vs University Stefan cel Mare Suceava vs Online Courses Learning vs Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA vs Veer Narmad South Gujarat University

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Egas Moniz Cooperative of Higher Education (5.00)
Egas Moniz Cooperative of Higher Education: wins 0/0 categories
University Stefan cel Mare Suceava: wins 0/0 categories
Online Courses Learning: wins 0/0 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/0 categories
Veer Narmad South Gujarat University: wins 0/0 categories
Universidad de los Llanos - Unillanos : wins 0/0 categories
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia: wins 0/0 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Adult Nursing
Best programme: Computer Engineering
London, The United Kingdom
4.70
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Leadership
Best programme: 2D Animation
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
4.00
Location
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Professors
5.00
4.50
5.00
Not rated
4.75
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
3.25
Not rated
2.00
Student life
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
4.00
Value
5.00
4.50
5.00
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive academic environment and mutual assistance
  • +Memorable and positive university experience
  • +Strong teaching quality and applicable knowledge
  • +Positive academic reputation and research output
  • +Flexible, self-paced learning
  • +Helpful instructors and fast support
  • +Relevant and high-quality course material

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and career preparation
  • +Supportive faculty and enriching environment
  • +Excellent infrastructure and diverse academic divisions

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent programs and well-equipped facilities.
  • +Numerous opportunities for students.
  • +Access to higher education.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of support and communication from instructors and staff is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Poor course structure and teaching quality detract from the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Communication and student support services are perceived as inadequate.

Nothing to show

  • -Unresolved administrative and communication issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources.
  • -Inconsistent and poor-quality instruction.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, achieving perfect scores in location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Professors also received a top rating of 5. The only area for potential improvement lies in its facilities, which garnered a solid but comparatively lower score of 3.

Outstanding marks were awarded for facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect five out of five. Professors and value also garnered strong scores at 4.5. The sole area with a comparatively lower rating was internationality, scoring a 4. This indicates a highly desirable campus environment and excellent academic support, with international integration being the primary area for potential enhancement.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received perfect scores. Every aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodations, was rated a strong 5. Its prime location and international appeal also contributed to this uniformly excellent evaluation, indicating exceptional value for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on this data.

Nothing to show

This institution achieves excellent scores in key areas such as **professors (4.75)**, student life (4.33), and value (4.5), indicating a strong academic and engaging environment. However, areas like **accommodation (3.33)** and internationality (3.25) received notably lower ratings, suggesting potential areas for improvement to offer a more comprehensive experience for all students. Facilities and location scored well at 4.25.

Nothing to show

This institution receives commendable scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Professors** and **Location**. Student Life and Facilities are also strong, both earning a 4. However, the university's **Internationality** stands out as its weakest point, receiving a low rating of 2. Accomodation also scored moderately at 3, while Value remains a solid 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This indicates exceptional satisfaction with the university. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight enjoyable and relevant learning experiences with keen teachers, and praise the university's strong research and ranking.

All three reviews are positive, with students praising flexibility and helpful instructors. They highlight acquiring skills and the convenience of self-paced learning.

Nothing to show

Students express strong satisfaction, with ~100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.75/5. Recurring themes include a strong academic structure, good infrastructure, and preparedness for careers.

Nothing to show

With a single review, the average rating is 4/5. The positive feedback (~100%) highlights good opportunities and an excellent Civil Engineering program, while suggesting a need to update traditional subjects with new technologies.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
50%
67%
0%
75%
0%
0%
4★
0%
50%
33%
0%
25%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Best Romanian University

Being part of USV was amazing. Studying what I liked while also being home was extremely nice and most of the teachers were very keen to teach you everything they knew. Even today I am using at work what I learnt at university.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close