Universidad estatal de Guayaquil - UG vs Seton Hill University vs International University of Struga - IUST vs Mississippi State University - MSU vs Cagayan State University - CSU

Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Mississippi State University - MSU (5.00)
Universidad estatal de Guayaquil - UG: wins 0/7 categories
Seton Hill University: wins 0/7 categories
International University of Struga - IUST: wins 0/7 categories
Mississippi State University - MSU: wins 7/7 categories
Cagayan State University - CSU: wins 0/7 categories
University of Malawi - UNIMA: wins 0/7 categories
Government Science College: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Seton Hill, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Starkville, Mississippi, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Criminology
tuguegarao, Philippines
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Arts and Humanities
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.40
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.20
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.90
Not rated
Student life
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.90
Not rated
Value
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.30
Not rated
Accommodation
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.40
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate professors and enriching practical/theoretical learning
  • +Opportunities for self-improvement and exposure to new environments/people
  • +Diverse faculties and recognized programs within Ecuador

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Welcoming campus community and social opportunities
  • +Helpful and friendly faculty support
  • +Positive overall student experience

Nothing to show

  • +Theory and practical skill integration
  • +Supportive and approachable lecturers
  • +Stimulating and relevant coursework

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequent complaints.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organizational issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with the quality and accessibility of resources and support.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unclear course expectations lead to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unhelpful instructors are frequently mentioned.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration for students.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution garners positive feedback. Its strongest areas are **Professors**, receiving a near-perfect score, and **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value**, all scoring above 4.2. **Accommodations** present the only area falling below a 4.0 rating, marking it as the weakest aspect. The university also fares well in **Student Life** and **Internationality**.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With perfect scores across the board, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength in every surveyed category. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received top marks, indicating a consistently high-quality experience. No weak areas were identified, suggesting a well-rounded and highly commendable university.

Nothing to show

This institution presents a solid academic offering, with professors and overall value receiving particularly high marks. Facilities and location also score well. Areas for potential improvement lie in accommodation, which received the lowest rating, with student life and internationality being mid-range.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives very positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students appreciate the enriching learning environments and the opportunity for self-improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

All feedback is positive, with a 5/5 average rating. Students praise helpful and friendly faculty, diversity, and numerous opportunities to connect and socialize on campus.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.3/5, ~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting challenging yet rewarding academics, knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, and practical learning. Accommodation availability is a minor concern.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
29%
0%
0%
100%
0%
50%
0%
4★
43%
0%
0%
0%
0%
30%
0%
3★
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Program

The university is the number one in both theories and practice and social work as a program fits well is this moment when the human kind needs support in their welfare now than before and the university has it all. The lecturers in the department were very helpful and friendly and it's blended with practicum where we were sent in various agencies and institutions to practice what we learnt in class for the full semester

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close