University of Crete - UOC vs Sardar Patel University - SPU vs Harper Adams University vs Stikes Nani Hasanuddin - Stikes Nani Hasanuddin vs State University of Makassar - UNM

Side-by-side comparison from 36 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Sardar Patel University - SPU (4.50)
University of Crete - UOC: wins 0/6 categories
Sardar Patel University - SPU: wins 6/6 categories
Harper Adams University: wins 0/6 categories
Stikes Nani Hasanuddin - Stikes Nani Hasanuddin : wins 0/6 categories
State University of Makassar - UNM: wins 0/6 categories
Institut Agama Islam STIBA Makassar - IAI STIBA MAKASSAR: wins 0/6 categories
St Joseph’s University - SJU: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Biology
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Newport, The United Kingdom
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Agricultural Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.65
4.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.65
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.18
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
2.88
4.50
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.71
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.94
4.50
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.44
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and helpful professors
  • +Opportunities for interdisciplinary study and research
  • +High academic standards and excellent facilities
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Well-equipped facilities and modern infrastructure
  • +Emphasis on academics and extracurricular activities
  • +Passionate & engaged lecturers
  • +Strong community and social life
  • +On-campus university events

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are common complaints.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication lead to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves its highest marks in professor quality, with a rating of 4.18. Value for money also scores well at 3.94. Conversely, accommodation presents the most significant area for improvement, receiving a low rating of 2.44. Internationality and facilities are mid-range at 2.88 and 3.65 respectively, while student life sits at 3.71.

Across the board, this institution garners impressive scores. Student life stands out as a particular strength, receiving a perfect rating. Facilities, while good, are the lowest-rated category at a solid four stars, though all other aspects, including professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, are highly rated at 4.5.

This institution exhibits a particularly strong showing in Student Life, earning a perfect score. Conversely, its Facilities received the lowest rating. Professors, Location, and Accommodations are all well-regarded, while Internationality and Value present a more moderate performance. Overall, the university offers a vibrant student experience alongside solid academic and living support.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~82% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.24/5, students praise knowledgeable and helpful faculty, diverse course options, and good research opportunities. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise the knowledgeable and supportive faculty, excellent academics, and a well-rounded education. The campus and infrastructure are noted as beautiful and modern, though some suggest improvements.

With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Students highlight engaged lecturers and a strong social scene fostered by its rural setting.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
42%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
39%
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
18%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great experience in general, still things to improve.

I’m an undergraduate student of Applied Mathematics. After years on the campus, I’ve liked the facilities a lot, and I think they’re the best in the country. I’ve also liked the knowledge coverage that the studies offer on the subject. The help from the profs is mixed. Some are helpful and nice but many deliver an impersonal way of teaching so students are left filling their blanks by themselves. The organizing of exams could be better if students and profs could find the best dates on the calendar without making it every-day-examine sometimes which can be stressful. Finally, some of the first subjects that you have to take are very crowded and students tend to sit by the back without a seat or being left out.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close