Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Anáhuac vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Universidad Tres Culturas - UTC vs Autonomous University of Mexico - UACM

Side-by-side comparison from 70 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Autonomous University of Mexico - UACM (5.00)
Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 4/6 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Tres Culturas - UTC : wins 0/6 categories
Autonomous University of Mexico - UACM: wins 2/6 categories
UCAD University - UCAD : wins 0/6 categories
Instituto Mexicano de Psicooncología - IMPo: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Civil Engineering
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: Electronics and Communication Engineering
Mexico City, Mexico
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.69
4.50
Not rated
4.50
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.20
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.10
4.41
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.90
4.59
Win
Not rated
3.50
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.24
4.63
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.59
4.63
Not rated
3.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.64
4.66
Win
Not rated
4.00
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent, experienced, and dedicated instructors.
  • +Relevant, industry-tailored programs for professional development.
  • +Strong focus on student learning and future success.
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent teachers and well-maintained facilities
  • +Flexible scheduling and convenient location options
  • +User-friendly platform and diverse payment choices
  • +Tuition-free education and career-focused programs
  • +Supportive faculty and diverse student community
  • +Flexible scheduling and affordable campus amenities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent disruptions.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Inefficient administrative and management practices cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources frustrate students.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

A diverse set of ratings reveals this institution excels in several key areas. The university is particularly lauded for its **Value** and **Student Life**, both receiving the highest marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a weaker point, alongside **Facilities**, which also fall below the average. Other aspects like **Location**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** generally fall within a positive range.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Nothing to show

This university's facilities stand out with an excellent rating of 4.5. Professors and student life also received solid scores of 4. Areas like location and accommodation are rated favorably at 4. The university's internationality and value propositions are its weakest points, both scoring 3.5.

Overall, the university demonstrates significant strengths, notably in its professors and value for money, both receiving perfect scores. Student life also stands out with a high rating. Conversely, accommodation presents a clear weakness, scoring the lowest. Facilities and location are moderately rated, while internationality falls somewhere in the middle, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strong points.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.33/5 average, university students praise dedicated and qualified teachers, well-structured courses, and excellent training. Some minor infrastructure and resource challenges were noted.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise good teachers, functional facilities, and an interactive platform. Convenient payment options and flexible schedules are also highlighted.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, students highlight highly qualified professors, excellent curricula, and outstanding faculty support. They also appreciate tuition-free education, flexible scheduling, and available amenities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
52%
67%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
30%
39%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
18%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close