Stony Brook University vs Sarajevo School of Science and Technology - SSST vs University College Lillebælt - UCL vs National University of Science and Technology - MISIS vs Palm Beach Atlantic University

Side-by-side comparison from 48 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Palm Beach Atlantic University (5.00)
Stony Brook University: wins 2/6 categories
Sarajevo School of Science and Technology - SSST: wins 0/6 categories
University College Lillebælt - UCL: wins 0/6 categories
National University of Science and Technology - MISIS: wins 0/6 categories
Palm Beach Atlantic University: wins 4/6 categories
Bayero University, Kano - BUK: wins 0/6 categories
Mzuzu University - Mzuni: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
New York City, United States
4.10
Read more reviews
16 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Innovation
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Philosophy and Religion
Best programme: Journalism and Mass Communication
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
4.20
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
3.75
4.00
Location
4.33
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.04
4.75
Professors
4.13
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.12
4.50
Internationality
4.40
Win
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
4.00
3.48
4.25
Student life
4.20
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.35
4.25
Value
4.20
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.24
4.75
Accommodation
4.07
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
3.33
3.75
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and dedicated professors.
  • +Vibrant student life and campus activities.
  • +High academic standards and learning opportunities.

Nothing to show

  • +Transformative learning & skill development
  • +Challenging and growth-oriented environment

Nothing to show

  • +Caring, supportive professors
  • +Strong academic preparation for future goals
  • +Fostering community and critical thinking
  • +Academic excellence and well-rounded graduates
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Inspiring learning environment and diverse student population
  • +High-quality education and dedicated lecturers
  • +Adequate and expanding learning facilities
  • +Variety of programs offered
Cons
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of support and understanding from faculty.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization, cause frustration.
  • -Lack of resources and support, such as insufficient staff and limited access to necessary materials, are frequently cited.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources impede learning.
  • -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a common complaint.
  • -Limited social and extracurricular activities.
  • -Academic stress and lack of fun.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Communication breakdowns and a general lack of responsiveness from the institution are a common concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution performs exceptionally well in many areas. Notably, its Internationality received the highest score, indicating a strong global presence. Location also stands out with a very favorable rating. Among the surveyed aspects, Accomodation received the lowest score, though it still remains positive. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid and well-rounded profile.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in its facilities, earning a perfect score. Professors and location are also highly regarded, both receiving 4.5 out of 5. Student life and accommodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest areas lie in its internationality and value, with both scoring 3.5, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

Nothing to show

Demonstrating remarkable strengths, this institution achieved perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. Accommodation and Internationality were also positively rated, though slightly lower at four out of five. Overall, the university presents a highly desirable and well-rounded educational experience, with its core offerings and student experience being particularly outstanding.

This institution receives strong commendations in several key areas, notably value at 4.24 and professors at 4.12. Location is also highly regarded. Conversely, student life and accommodation present as weaker points, with ratings of 3.35 and 3.33 respectively. Facilities and internationality fall within a moderate range, suggesting areas for potential enhancement alongside its already robust strengths.

This university garners excellent marks in several key areas. Its location and value are particularly strong, receiving top scores. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. Facilities and professors are rated highly, indicating a solid academic environment. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which, while still decent, scores lower than other aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.13/5, ~74% of reviews are highly positive, praising supportive professors, engaging student life, and academic excellence. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, the university is highly regarded. Approximately 50% of feedback is positive, highlighting transformative learning experiences and skill acquisition. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the lone review highlights strong academic preparation and caring professors. The program fosters community, engagement, and critical thinking. No negative feedback was provided.

~74% of reviews are positive, praising academic excellence and supportive lecturers. ~4% express concern about a heavy workload and limited practical infrastructure.

Reviews are highly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the quality of education, dedicated lecturers, and improving facilities. Some feedback noted excessive assignments.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
0%
50%
0%
100%
52%
50%
4★
63%
0%
0%
0%
0%
28%
50%
3★
13%
0%
50%
0%
0%
16%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Bayero University Kano

I am thrilled to share my positive experience at Bayero University Kano (BUK), pursuing Computer Engineering. The vibrant academic environment and the overall atmosphere at BUK have truly made it a standout choice for higher education. One of the highlights of my time at BUK is the exceptional student community. The camaraderie among students creates a supportive and collaborative atmosphere. Whether it's group projects, study sessions, or extracurricular activities, the sense of unity within the student body enhances the overall learning experience. The relationships forged among students are not only within the academic realm but extend to a sense of shared goals and aspirations. The diversity of backgrounds and perspectives within the student community fosters a rich learning environment, contributing to a well-rounded education. The quality of facilities at BUK is another aspect that has greatly contributed to my positive experience. The university provides state-of-the-art laboratories, well-equipped classrooms, and modern computing facilities. These resources have been instrumental in enhancing my understanding of Computer Engineering concepts through hands-on experiences and practical applications. Bayero University Kano's commitment to academic excellence places it among the best universities in Nigeria and West Africa. The curriculum for Computer Engineering is robust, aligning with industry standards and ensuring that students are well-prepared for the challenges of the technology sector. Moreover, the university's dedication to continuous improvement is evident in the maintenance of high-quality teaching staff and the incorporation of cutting-edge technologies into the learning environment. This forward-thinking approach contributes to the relevance and competitiveness of the education provided. In conclusion, my experience at Bayero University Kano has been overwhelmingly positive. The strong student community, meaningful relationships, top-notch facilities, and the university's esteemed reputation all contribute to making BUK an excellent choice for pursuing Computer Engineering. I feel fortunate to be part of this academic community that values both personal and academic growth.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close