University of Applied Sciences Stralsund vs John Carroll University vs Lahore College for Women University - LCWU vs Vatel Switzerland Hotel & Tourism Business School vs Serang Raya University - UNSERA

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Xi'an Jiaotong University - XJTU (5.00)
University of Applied Sciences Stralsund: wins 0/5 categories
John Carroll University: wins 0/5 categories
Lahore College for Women University - LCWU: wins 0/5 categories
Vatel Switzerland Hotel & Tourism Business School: wins 1/5 categories
Serang Raya University - UNSERA: wins 0/5 categories
Mzuzu University - Mzuni: wins 3/5 categories
Xi'an Jiaotong University - XJTU: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Heights, Ohio, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Botany
Best programme: International Hospitality and Tourism Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Arts
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
3.80
3.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Location
Not rated
Not rated
4.60
3.00
Not rated
4.75
Win
3.00
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.25
Win
3.00
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
3.00
Not rated
4.25
Win
4.00
Value
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.75
5.00
Win
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
3.67
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.75
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and engaging, practical teaching
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty and staff
  • +Safe and well-equipped learning environment
  • +Practical work experience integrated with studies
  • +Industry-relevant teachers and small class sizes
  • +Business-focused curriculum with added hospitality specialization

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality education and dedicated lecturers
  • +Adequate and expanding learning facilities
  • +Variety of programs offered
  • +High-quality education and challenging environment
  • +Strong career preparation and successful future outlook
Cons

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of resources and connections for research in science departments.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Communication breakdowns and a general lack of responsiveness from the institution are a common concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The university excels particularly in its **location**, receiving a strong 4.6 rating. Student life, internationality, and professor quality are also well-regarded, all scoring a solid 4. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are facilities (3.8) and accommodation (3.67). Overall, value is rated highly at 4.

Professors stand out with the highest rating of 5, indicating exceptional academic instruction. Conversely, facilities and student life received moderate scores of 3. The university also scores well in accommodation, internationality, and value, all at 4.

Nothing to show

This university garners excellent marks in several key areas. Its location and value are particularly strong, receiving top scores. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. Facilities and professors are rated highly, indicating a solid academic environment. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which, while still decent, scores lower than other aspects.

This institution garners exceptional scores in key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its professors and value. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded, both receiving solid 4-star ratings. Conversely, the university's location, accommodation, and internationality present opportunities for improvement, each rated at a moderate 3 stars.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.5/5, roughly 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, approachable professors, and engaging classes. Approximately 17% of feedback is negative, with one mention of issues in the science department's research support.

With an average rating of 4/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise the program's focus on practical experience through internships and on-campus work. Small class sizes and experienced instructors are also highlighted as strengths.

Nothing to show

Reviews are highly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the quality of education, dedicated lecturers, and improving facilities. Some feedback noted excessive assignments.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This single positive review highlights a great career choice, high-quality education, and challenging growth environment.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
100%
4★
0%
0%
67%
100%
0%
50%
0%
3★
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close