Universität Witten Herdecke vs Lyceum-Northwestern University vs Limkokwing University of Creative Technology vs University of Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden vs Borough of Manhattan Community College

Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Borough of Manhattan Community College (4.60)
Universität Witten Herdecke: wins 1/6 categories
Lyceum-Northwestern University: wins 0/6 categories
Limkokwing University of Creative Technology: wins 0/6 categories
University of Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden: wins 0/6 categories
Borough of Manhattan Community College: wins 2/6 categories
University of Transport and Communications: wins 0/6 categories
Université du Lac Tanganyika: wins 3/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Law and Politics
Best programme: Advertising
Best programme: Artificial Intelligence
New York City, United States
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Public Health
Bujumbura-Mairie, Rwanda
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
1.00
4.10
4.00
4.36
3.00
5.00
Win
Location
5.00
3.00
4.40
2.00
4.60
4.00
5.00
Professors
5.00
Win
3.00
4.40
4.33
4.55
4.00
4.00
Internationality
4.00
3.00
4.50
3.67
4.27
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
4.00
3.00
4.50
3.67
4.45
3.00
5.00
Win
Value
4.00
3.00
4.50
3.33
4.64
Win
3.00
3.00
Accommodation
1.00
2.00
2.89
2.33
4.55
Win
3.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Personal attention and supportive relationships with professors
  • +Small class sizes fostering deep discussion and exploration
  • +Inclusive and motivating community of peers

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and approachable faculty fostering academic and personal growth
  • +Diverse and creative learning environment encouraging innovation and collaboration
  • +Relevant curriculum and modern facilities preparing for career challenges
  • +Relevant, practical curriculum and project-based learning
  • +Supportive and approachable professors
  • +Engaging and friendly learning environment
  • +Supportive and engaging faculty
  • +Opportunities for career advancement and growth
  • +Convenient location and accessibility

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated teaching staff
  • +Accessible higher education
  • +Modest infrastructure and resources
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities
  • -Lack of faculty engagement

Nothing to show

  • -Overcrowded classrooms and limited resources.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of parking.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Communication breakdowns and a perceived lack of student support are prevalent concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring concern.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic success.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication.
  • -Insufficient resources and outdated learning materials.
  • -Limited career services and job prospects.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts outstanding ratings for its **professors and location**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, student life, internationality, and value are also strong, all scoring a commendable 4 out of 5. The most significant area for improvement is **accommodation**, which received a low rating of 1. This suggests a need to address housing concerns to enhance the overall student experience.

Nothing to show

Overall, this institution garners strong marks, particularly excelling in Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving a 4.5 rating. Professors and Location also rate highly at 4.4. However, Accomodation stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2.89. Facilities received a respectable 4.1.

This university demonstrates strong performance in its academic offerings and campus environment. Professors receive a commendable rating of 4.33, and facilities are also rated well at 4. The university also scores reasonably well for student life and internationality, both around 3.67. However, areas requiring improvement include location and accommodation, which are rated lower at 2 and 2.33 respectively, suggesting these aspects may be less appealing to students.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Location** and **Value**, both scoring an impressive 4.6. **Professors** and **Accommodation** also receive high marks, averaging 4.55. The **Student Life** is rated favorably at 4.45. The area with the lowest score, though still respectable, is **Internationality** at 4.27, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.36.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities, location, student life, and internationality. However, its value proposition received a lower rating of 3, suggesting a potential area for improvement. Professors and accommodation also scored well with a rating of 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, students highly praise the university. Recurring themes highlight a diverse, motivating environment with small, discussion-focused courses, and positive professor-student relationships. Negative feedback is absent.

Nothing to show

With 90% positive feedback and a 4.5/5 average rating, students praise the university's supportive staff and creative learning environment. Some noted minor concerns regarding classroom facilities.

All reviews are positive, indicating a ~100% favorable student sentiment. Students highlight practical curricula, supportive professors, and project-based learning as key strengths.

With an average rating of 4.64/5 from 11 reviews, students highlight excellent, affordable education, particularly praising supportive faculty and diverse programs. ~0% negative feedback indicates a highly positive sentiment.

Nothing to show

Based on one review, the university receives a 4/5 rating. ~100% of feedback is positive, with students appreciating dedicated staff. Some desire modernized infrastructure and expanded academic offerings.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
60%
0%
64%
0%
0%
4★
50%
0%
30%
100%
36%
0%
100%
3★
0%
100%
10%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nursing

Our university, or in our department, they always rush lessons. So when it comes to our exams, we can’t review all the topics. They also tend to give lots of workloads and they want us to pass it the next day.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close