TIAS School for Business and Society vs National Chiao Tung University vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Coimbra Superior School of Education - ESEC vs Instituto Português de Administração de Marketing - IPAM

Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
TIAS School for Business and Society: wins 0/1 categories
National Chiao Tung University: wins 0/1 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/1 categories
Coimbra Superior School of Education - ESEC: wins 1/1 categories
Instituto Português de Administração de Marketing - IPAM: wins 0/1 categories
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research - AcSIR: wins 0/1 categories
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University - NYCU: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Best programme: School of Arts and Sciences
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
5.00
4.40
4.33
4.50
Not rated
4.00
Location
5.00
4.00
4.70
4.67
5.00
Not rated
3.00
Professors
5.00
5.00
4.60
4.50
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
5.00
4.00
4.60
4.17
5.00
Not rated
4.00
Student life
2.00
4.00
3.90
4.83
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Value
5.00
5.00
3.90
4.50
5.00
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
2.00
5.00
3.00
4.17
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Personal assistance and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Engaging professors and insightful discussions
  • +Diverse student body and collaborative learning opportunities.
  • +Merged programs offering strong technological and medical expertise.
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +Engaging and practical curriculum
  • +Supportive and passionate faculty
  • +Welcoming and inclusive atmosphere
  • +Personal student-teacher relationships and inclusive environment
  • +Qualified and effective teaching leading to understanding

Nothing to show

  • +Scenic and well-equipped campus facilities
  • +Highly regarded specific schools and programmes
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support from staff is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major drawback.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered, failing to engage students.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leads to student dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

Across the surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **facilities, professors, location, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving perfect scores. In contrast, areas for development appear to be **student life and accommodation**, with significantly lower ratings in these aspects.

With outstanding scores in facilities, professors, and accommodation, this institution excels in core academic and living provisions. Student life and internationality are also highly rated, indicating a well-rounded experience. The location receives a good, though not perfect, score, representing the only slight area for potential improvement amidst otherwise excellent feedback. Overall, the university offers substantial value.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

An evaluation of the university reveals a strong overall performance. Student Life stands out with the highest rating, reflecting a vibrant campus experience. Location also scores very favorably. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities and Accomodation, which, while good, received the lowest scores. Value and Professors are rated highly, indicating satisfaction with academic staff and the overall return on investment. Internationality also shows solid, though not top-tier, performance.

This institution garners exceptional ratings, particularly excelling in the areas of Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value, all receiving a perfect score. Facilities and Student Life also stand out with high marks. The weakest area, Accommodation, received a satisfactory rating. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture.

Nothing to show

This institution garners significant praise in several key areas. Its accommodation and professor quality stand out with perfect scores. Facilities and student life are also rated highly. However, its location receives a more moderate assessment, suggesting it might be an area for potential improvement or consideration by prospective students. The university also demonstrates good internationality and provides solid value for its students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This suggests a highly positive experience, with feedback praising personal assistance and engaging professors. No negative feedback was reported.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the diverse student composition and valuable learning opportunities, appreciating the combined strengths of the merged universities.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

With a 4.33/5 average rating, 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the engaging curriculum, supportive professors, and welcoming atmosphere, particularly highlighting professional and useful courses in sports.

With an average rating of 5/5 from two reviews, students praise the personal education and welcoming environment fostered by close student-teacher relationships. They highlight qualified teachers and 100% understanding in teaching.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university has overwhelmingly positive reviews. Students praise its scenic, spacious main campus and renowned Schools of Electronics and Information, and Medicine. There is no negative feedback.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
100%
60%
33%
100%
0%
100%
4★
0%
0%
40%
67%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close