Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Universidad Central - Ucentral vs Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz vs Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG: wins 1/4 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Central - Ucentral: wins 1/4 categories
Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz: wins 2/4 categories
Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC: wins 0/4 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Antonio Nariño: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Management
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: BSC Medical Laboratory Technology
Best programme: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.50
Not rated
4.33
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
2.00
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.00
Not rated
3.67
4.00
3.00
Not rated
3.33
Value
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty and academic level
  • +Relevant and practical learning experiences
  • +Attractive and accessible campus locations

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive environment & student well-being
  • +Academic focus & professional growth
  • +Welcoming campus & convenient location
  • +Practical, relevant assignments and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Strong psychology program.
  • +Expert faculty and hands-on learning
  • +Diverse and in-demand programs
  • +Convenient campus access

Nothing to show

  • +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
  • +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
  • +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of transparency and communication causes dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of support and unclear expectations contribute to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.

Nothing to show

This institution receives notable strengths in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring 4.33. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** also present solid performance, averaging a 4.0. The university's **Student Life** is rated moderately well at 3.67, while **Internationality** stands as its weakest area with a score of 3.

With excellent scores in accommodation and location, this institution shines. Its facilities, professors, and student life also received positive marks. However, its internationality received a more moderate rating, representing the weakest area. Overall, the university offers strong value.

This institution demonstrates a notable strength in the quality of its professors, receiving a perfect score. Conversely, its location received no rating, indicating a potential area for improvement or a lack of data. Other aspects like facilities, student life, and accommodation were moderately rated, suggesting a generally satisfactory experience. Internationality scores were lower, and value for money was rated well.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.

Nothing to show

With 3.8/5 stars from 5 reviews, ~60% are positive, praising a cozy, well-located environment supporting professional growth and well-being. Academics are prioritized. No negative feedback was reported.

With one review averaging 4/5 stars, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight great professors and practical assignments, though infrastructure issues were noted.

With an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the excellent faculty, good clinical sites, and the seamless integration of theory and practice. Accessibility via public transport or car is also highlighted.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.

Rating distribution
5★
40%
0%
20%
0%
100%
0%
100%
4★
60%
0%
40%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close