Universidad Europea - UE vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Universitat d'Alacant vs Universidad Miguel Hernández - UMH vs Escola d'Art i Superior de Disseny d'Alacant - EASDA
Side-by-side comparison from 222 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Modern teaching and attractive campus
- +Strong business opportunities and practical learning
- +Supportive faculty and international exchange programs
- +Welcoming people and active campus life
- +Comprehensive and complementary programmes
- +Practical learning opportunities and real-world application
- +Beautiful, convenient, and well-equipped campus with natural elements.
- +Kind, passionate, and supportive teachers fostering good student relationships.
- +Positive student atmosphere with engaging activities and a welcoming city.
- +Strong academic and research support from supervisors and diverse, interdisciplinary programs.
- +Modern facilities, including well-equipped labs and practice areas.
- +Supportive and collaborative student environment.
- +Professional, involved faculty and familiar atmosphere
- +Diverse design program offerings
- +Potential for improvement in facilities and organization
Nothing to show
- +Practical, real-world projects and industry focus
- +Strong professional network and career preparation
- +Supportive and personalized learning environment
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Teachers are indifferent and unsupportive of student learning.
- -High costs for course materials.
- -Poor professor English proficiency and lack of care for international students.
- -Disorganization and a lack of a cohesive program structure.
- -Inadequate academic training and poor teaching quality.
- -Outdated facilities and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of transparency and fair handling of controversies.
- -Outdated or insufficient facilities that detract from the student experience.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and difficult access.
- -Disappointing academic programs and limited practical application.
Nothing to show
- -Excessive administrative burdens and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
Overall, the university receives strong marks, particularly in **Internationality (4.6)** and **Facilities (4.33)**. Student Life and Professors also score well, both above 4.2. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation (3.87)** and **Value (3.78)**, though these still represent a moderately positive rating.
This university garners strong marks in academics and overall experience, with Professors receiving the highest rating at approximately 3.9 and Facilities closely following at 3.83. Student Life and Location also score well. Areas for potential improvement lie in Accomodation and Internationality, both rated at 3.44, indicating these aspects may not meet the same high standards as other surveyed categories.
Student life stands out as the university's strongest attribute, achieving a perfect score. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating. Other evaluated aspects, including facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value, all fall within a generally positive range, indicating a well-rounded experience with room for improvement in housing.
This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities**, earning a 4 out of 5. Student Life also scores well at 3.875. The university's **Accommodations** present the most significant area for improvement, rated at 3.125. Other aspects, including Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value, fall within a mid-range of 3.4 to 3.55.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, internationality, and overall value, all receiving perfect scores. Facilities and accommodation are also highly rated, suggesting a comfortable and well-equipped environment. However, the location is a significant weakness, scoring only one out of five, and professor quality, while decent, is the lowest-rated academic aspect.
Nothing to show
This institution receives a well-rounded set of ratings. **Professors** are the highest-rated area, closely followed by **Student Life** and **Location**. **Accommodations** emerge as the weakest point among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, indicating a generally positive student experience.
Nearly 74% of 54 reviews are positive, highlighting modern teaching methods, spacious campuses, and good career opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~3.7%) notes administrative issues and unengaged instructors.
With ~74% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.94/5, students highlight positive interactions and campus life. A small percentage (~6%) express disappointment, citing low academic rigor and English proficiency concerns.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 63 reviews, ~86% praise the beautiful, convenient campus and friendly, passionate teachers. A small ~5% of feedback points to concerns about teaching quality and exam structure.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic support, research opportunities, and interdisciplinary programs. A small percentage (~7%) of feedback mentions concerns with campus facilities and university ethics.
With a 3.25 average rating, most (around 75%) student feedback is positive, highlighting professional teachers and a good learning experience. However, about 25% of reviews mention significant issues with outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
Nothing to show
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% giving high ratings. Students highlight an enriching, practical learning experience, international environment, and strong professional preparation. There is no negative feedback.
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
Nothing to show
Universitat d'Alacant enhances the energy of its campus community through a diverse selection of extracurricular activities. The university fosters an atmosphere that nurtures creativity and individual development, reflected in its modern facilities and dynamic learning environments. Professors, characterized by their passion and expertise, implement creative teaching approaches.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!
