Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - UAM vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad en Línea - UTEL vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 85 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - UAM (4.70)
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - UAM: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad en Línea - UTEL: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Gustavo A Madero Technological Institute II - ITGAM II: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration and Social Policy
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Engineering of Computing Systems
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Architecture
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
4.50
3.67
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.07
Location
3.98
4.50
4.67
4.75
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.07
Professors
4.37
4.41
4.33
4.63
Win
Not rated
3.00
4.45
Internationality
3.86
4.59
3.67
4.63
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.83
Student life
4.66
4.63
3.67
3.88
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.14
Value
4.67
Win
4.63
3.67
4.13
Not rated
3.00
4.17
Accommodation
3.81
4.66
Win
3.33
3.00
Not rated
4.00
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and supportive teaching staff
  • +High-quality, relevant curriculum and academic resources
  • +Excellent facilities and affordability
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities
  • +Expert professors and practical career knowledge
  • +Flexible online learning options
  • +Valuable skill development and enriching experience
  • +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
  • +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
  • +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Strong preparation in engineering, technology, and architecture
  • +Supportive professors and engaging academic/extracurricular activities
  • +Excellent programs and well-equipped facilities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication is poor and unclear.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and insufficient support hinder learning.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Poor communication and administrative support.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frustrating.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication create significant problems.
  • -A lack of student support and engagement from faculty is a recurring concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in **Student Life** and **Value**, both receiving ratings above 4.6. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.37. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, rated at 3.81, closely followed by **Location** and **Internationality**, which are slightly below 4.0. Facilities and Professors also score well.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Across several key areas, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its location and professors are particularly well-regarded, receiving the highest ratings. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, scoring lowest among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like facilities, student life, internationality, and value are rated moderately, suggesting areas for potential improvement while maintaining a generally positive standing.

Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Overall, this university receives strong ratings across several key areas. Professors are particularly highly rated, reflecting a key strength. The university also scores well in Student Life and Value. However, Accommodations present the weakest area, with a significantly lower score compared to other categories. Internationality and Facilities also fall within a moderate range.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 10 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.7/5. Students praise the rigorous and relevant curriculum, supportive and expert teaching staff, and excellent facilities.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight qualified professors and a positive online learning experience, including acquiring career-relevant knowledge and reinforcing computer skills. No negative reviews were recorded.

All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With an average rating of 4.38/5 based on 29 reviews, ~86% are positive. Students praise practical preparation, qualified professors, and extracurricular activities. No negative reviews were recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
70%
67%
67%
63%
0%
50%
52%
4★
30%
39%
0%
38%
0%
0%
34%
3★
0%
3%
33%
0%
0%
0%
14%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close