Padjadjaran University - UNPAD vs Bandung Islamic University vs National Institute of Technology - Itenas vs Pasundan University - UNPAS vs Politeknik Negeri Bandung - POLBAN

Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pasundan University - UNPAS (5.00)
Padjadjaran University - UNPAD: wins 4/7 categories
Bandung Islamic University: wins 0/7 categories
National Institute of Technology - Itenas: wins 0/7 categories
Pasundan University - UNPAS: wins 2/7 categories
Politeknik Negeri Bandung - POLBAN: wins 1/7 categories
YAPARI-ABA Foreign Language College Bandung - STBA (SEKOLAH TINGGI BAHASA ASING) YAPARI BANDUNG: wins 0/7 categories
Sunan Gunung Djati Islamic State University of Bandung - UIN SGD: wins 0/7 categories
Category ratings
Facilities
3.91
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.37
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.45
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.05
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.55
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.18
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.05
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Valuable practical experience and comprehensive subject knowledge
  • +Strong academic reputation and promising future career prospects
  • +Pleasant campus environment and experienced, diverse faculty

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse and inclusive campus culture
  • +Rich learning environment fostering growth
  • +Vibrant community engagement

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and career relevance is a concern.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of essential resources and academic support causes dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Consistently strong scores define this university's reputation, with Student Life achieving the highest mark at 4.55. Professors and Location also garnered excellent feedback, both exceeding 4.35. While most areas received solid ratings, Facilities represent the lowest-scoring aspect, at 3.91, though still within a positive range. Accomodation, Internationality, and Value also demonstrate commendable performance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives top marks for its excellent professors, reflecting a strong academic environment. While its location and accommodation received middling scores, most other aspects, including facilities, student life, internationality, and overall value, were rated highly. This suggests a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in teaching quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 19 positive reviews out of 22, ~86% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise excellent lecturers and diverse academic opportunities. No negative reviews were received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This feedback strongly praises the university's embrace of cultural diversity and inclusivity, fostering a vibrant learning environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
41%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
45%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
14%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close