Universidad Internacional de la Rioja - UNIR vs Unidades Tecnológicas de Santander - UTS vs Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA vs Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology - UNIST vs University of Pardubice
Side-by-side comparison from 41 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, theory-practice blend curriculum
- +Flexible online learning for work-life balance
- +Supportive, experienced faculty
- +Supportive professors and inclusive environment for women in STEM
- +Excellent labs and specialized classrooms, particularly for engineering fields
- +High academic difficulty and a desirable city for students
Nothing to show
- +Practical research opportunities and hands-on lab experience.
- +High-quality facilities, curriculum, and campus.
- +Collaborative and project-driven learning environments.
- +Modern facilities and IT resources
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Diverse study programs and extracurricular activities
- +Comprehensive general and critical thinking lessons
- +Excellent facilities and resources for agribusiness
- +Supportive academic and research environment
Nothing to show
- -Students are frustrated by a lack of practical application and disorganized, repetitive content.
- -There are significant administrative and management issues, including pressure tactics, unclear conditions, and miscommunication.
- -Concerns are raised about misleading program information, undisclosed costs, and a failure to deliver promised credentials.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are unengaging.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Course content or delivery is often perceived as irrelevant or unengaging.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of practical application and real-world relevance in coursework is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
Analysis of the university's ratings reveals that **Professors** are the strongest area, earning a score of 3.62. The university also performs well in **Location**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all scoring above 3.2. In contrast, **Facilities** emerge as the weakest point, with a rating of 2.88. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are also areas with moderate scores, falling just below 3.
Exceptional strengths are evident in the university's facilities, professors, and student life, all receiving a perfect score of 5. Internationality also scores well at 4. However, the institution faces significant challenges in location and accommodation, both scoring 0. Value for money is rated moderately at 3.
Nothing to show
The university excels in its facilities and value, both receiving high marks. Professors are also well-regarded, contributing to a positive academic experience. However, student life is a notable area for improvement, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Accommodation and internationality are rated moderately, as is the location.
This institution receives high marks across most aspects. Its strongest areas are consistently rated at 4.67, notably in location, student life, internationality, and value. Facilities, professors, and accommodation also score well, all around 4.33. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture with particularly excellent offerings in its surrounding environment and student experience.
This institution garners exceptional marks in several key areas. Its Internationality score of 5.0 is a standout, alongside a high rating for Facilities and Professors, both at 4.625. Value is also a strong point at 4.75. Student Life and Accommodation are well-regarded with scores of 4.375. The Location is the lowest rated aspect at 4.0.
Nothing to show
~74% of 26 reviews are positive, with students appreciating practical, theory-based programs and flexible online formats. ~31% of reviews express dissatisfaction, citing disorganization, theoretical content, and undisclosed costs.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise supportive professors, excellent laboratory experiences, and a strong academic program, particularly in technical fields.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight excellent class offerings, numerous research laboratory opportunities for practical skill development, and high-quality facilities and campus.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, all 3 reviews are positive. Students highlight modern IT tech, many study opportunities, and preparation for IT careers. They also praise great programs, young teachers, and a beautiful city with remote or daily study options and good accommodation.
With an average rating of 4.63, all reviews are positive, highlighting adequate facilities, a supportive academic environment, and effective general and specialized lessons. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
First, since I asked for information for the ELE Master, I had the advisor constantly pressuring me to decide, to enroll, to PAY, to sign... she would not leave me alone for a day. Up to that point, I didn't like it, but I thought, well, it was their way of selling, 1st red flag. 2nd red flag: When signing the registration on the platform, they asked me if I agreed with the conditions, but the conditions did not appear anywhere, to which I told the advisor that I could not sign a document where they asked me if I agree to the conditions that are not explained to me. She responded by saying that there was "nothing strange", and that the conditions were that I was going to study at the university, and I was surprised that a supposedly serious institution believes that one must accept the conditions that they tell you orally, is it Seriously?, 3rd red flag. However, I wanted to continue trusting (silly me) and I signed. However, I told advisor Pilar Fuentes that, as a suggestion, the conditions should be explicitly described in that document, to which she did not respond anything, nor to my question about what the next step was. Two days passed and still no response. I asked him again what the next step was and three days later he responded: "Hello, how can I help you?" As if he didn't know me, I repeated the question again, which remained unanswered for two more days, that is, 5 in total. (4th red flag), clearly showing that this university only cares about PROFIT. Once they take money from you, they forget. During those days, another person already sent me the "20 installments" in which I had to pay, which surprised me again because no one asked me how I was going to pay. When I asked this person about it, he told me I had SIGNED for 20 installments... (5th red flag). What other surprise were they going to come up with that I had signed? But of course, it was my mistake to accept what the advisor told me. When I wrote to this advisor again to tell her that she couldn't believe that she still hadn't answered me after 5 days and that she wasn't going to give another cent to this university, she just reacted with a not very credible excuse. I demanded the return of MY money (290 USD) and despite the fact that I explained to them in the discharge department that I had completely lost confidence in the institution due to lack of professionalism and transparency, and despite the fact that I offered to give them details of what happened, little They didn't care and told me they wouldn't give me ANYTHING back. In other words, I confirmed the advisor's attitude, but that this is a problem not only for her, but also for an institutional problem. The least you expect when you complain about a terrible service is that the person providing said service is a little embarrassed and at least returns the money that is not theirs. But hey, let it benefit them. As for me, I will tell all my colleagues about this terrible experience so that they can look for a university that is worth it. And I hope my review helps others not to fall into the trap.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show