Unidades Tecnológicas de Santander - UTS vs University Centre Grimsby vs Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA vs Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology - UNIST vs University of Pardubice

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: IPB University - IPB (4.60)
Unidades Tecnológicas de Santander - UTS: wins 2/6 categories
University Centre Grimsby: wins 1/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology - UNIST: wins 0/6 categories
University of Pardubice: wins 0/6 categories
IPB University - IPB: wins 3/6 categories
Tecnológica del Oriente: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Electronics and Communication Engineering
Lincoln, The United Kingdom
1.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Pardubice, Czech Republic
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Analytical Chemistry
bogor, Indonesia
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Agriculture
Santander, Colombia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
4.50
4.33
4.63
Not rated
Location
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.50
4.67
4.00
Not rated
Professors
5.00
5.00
Not rated
4.00
4.33
4.63
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
1.00
Not rated
3.50
4.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
5.00
Win
1.00
Not rated
2.00
4.67
4.38
Not rated
Value
3.00
3.00
Not rated
4.50
4.67
4.75
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
3.50
4.33
4.38
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive professors and inclusive environment for women in STEM
  • +Excellent labs and specialized classrooms, particularly for engineering fields
  • +High academic difficulty and a desirable city for students
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable instructors
  • +Supportive and collaborative learning environment
  • +Practical and career-relevant curriculum

Nothing to show

  • +Practical research opportunities and hands-on lab experience.
  • +High-quality facilities, curriculum, and campus.
  • +Collaborative and project-driven learning environments.
  • +Modern facilities and IT resources
  • +Supportive and accessible faculty
  • +Diverse study programs and extracurricular activities
  • +Comprehensive general and critical thinking lessons
  • +Excellent facilities and resources for agribusiness
  • +Supportive academic and research environment

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are unengaging.
  • -Absent teachers and incomplete courses are a major issue.
  • -Program content deviates significantly from advertised offerings.
  • -Students feel abandoned to self-teach due to lack of qualified instruction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Course content or delivery is often perceived as irrelevant or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and real-world relevance in coursework is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Exceptional strengths are evident in the university's facilities, professors, and student life, all receiving a perfect score of 5. Internationality also scores well at 4. However, the institution faces significant challenges in location and accommodation, both scoring 0. Value for money is rated moderately at 3.

Offering a mixed picture, this institution excels in its **professors** and **location**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, **student life**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are significant areas for improvement, each scoring a low 1. Facilities are rated moderately at 2, while the overall **value** sits in the middle at 3.

Nothing to show

The university excels in its facilities and value, both receiving high marks. Professors are also well-regarded, contributing to a positive academic experience. However, student life is a notable area for improvement, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Accommodation and internationality are rated moderately, as is the location.

This institution receives high marks across most aspects. Its strongest areas are consistently rated at 4.67, notably in location, student life, internationality, and value. Facilities, professors, and accommodation also score well, all around 4.33. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture with particularly excellent offerings in its surrounding environment and student experience.

This institution garners exceptional marks in several key areas. Its Internationality score of 5.0 is a standout, alongside a high rating for Facilities and Professors, both at 4.625. Value is also a strong point at 4.75. Student Life and Accommodation are well-regarded with scores of 4.375. The Location is the lowest rated aspect at 4.0.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise supportive professors, excellent laboratory experiences, and a strong academic program, particularly in technical fields.

This university received a single review, which was overwhelmingly negative (1/5 stars). The sole feedback highlighted concerns about absent teachers, incomplete courses, and a misleading program description.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight excellent class offerings, numerous research laboratory opportunities for practical skill development, and high-quality facilities and campus.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, all 3 reviews are positive. Students highlight modern IT tech, many study opportunities, and preparation for IT careers. They also praise great programs, young teachers, and a beautiful city with remote or daily study options and good accommodation.

With an average rating of 4.63, all reviews are positive, highlighting adequate facilities, a supportive academic environment, and effective general and specialized lessons. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
0%
50%
33%
63%
0%
4★
50%
0%
0%
50%
67%
38%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close