Universidad Latina de Costa Rica - ULATINA vs Universidad Estatal a Distancia - UNED vs Universidad Internacional de las Américas - UIA vs Universidad Hispanoamericana - UH vs Universidad Federada San Judas Tadeo

Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Latina de Costa Rica - ULATINA (4.30)
Universidad Latina de Costa Rica - ULATINA: wins 2/5 categories
Universidad Estatal a Distancia - UNED: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Internacional de las Américas - UIA: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Hispanoamericana - UH: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Federada San Judas Tadeo: wins 0/5 categories
National University of Costa Rica - UNA: wins 3/5 categories
Castro Carazo University: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: BA International Studies
Best programme: Bachelor in Digital Communication and E-Business
Best programme: International Business
San Jose, Costa Rica
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.67
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.17
Win
Not rated
3.50
2.50
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Student life
3.50
Not rated
3.50
3.50
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Value
3.83
Not rated
3.50
3.50
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.83
Not rated
3.00
3.50
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent, well-prepared professors and relevant subject matter
  • +Flexible schedules accommodating work and study
  • +Opportunities for networking and an international atmosphere
  • +Affordability and flexibility for working students
  • +National recognition and accreditation
  • +Supportive tutor access for questions
  • +High quality, knowledgeable and passionate faculty with real-world experience.
  • +Well-thought-out career plans and unique degree catalog offering diverse programs.
  • +Opportunities for community involvement and skill development.
  • +**Academic excellence and practical learning:** Students appreciate the focus on high-quality education that incorporates real-world application.
  • +**Welcoming and motivating environment:** The supportive and collaborative atmosphere fosters student development.
  • +**Experienced and engaging faculty:** Teachers are recognized for their professional expertise and ability to connect theory with practice.

Nothing to show

  • +Comprehensive and engaging curriculum
  • +Supportive faculty availability
  • +Opportunities for athletic participation

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and unhelpful staff create frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support regarding academic matters is a recurring issue.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Communication gaps lead to confusion and dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are a common complaint.
  • -Students frequently express dissatisfaction with administrative and management issues.
  • -The curriculum is often criticized for being outdated and irrelevant.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a strong profile, particularly excelling in **Location** with a rating of 4.67 and **Internationality** at 4.5. Professors and Facilities also received favorable scores. Conversely, **Student Life** emerged as the weakest area, scoring 3.5. Accommodations and value for money were moderately rated, alongside solid but not exceptional performance in facilities.

Across all surveyed categories, the institution received ratings of zero, indicating a consistent lack of performance in every area. Consequently, no specific strengths or weaknesses can be identified as all aspects of the university are performing at the same minimal level. This uniform outcome suggests a need for comprehensive review and improvement across the board.

This institution exhibits a mixed performance across various aspects. Its location stands out as a significant strength, earning a perfect score. Areas like professors, student life, and value are rated competently at 3.5. Conversely, facilities, accommodation, and internationality are the weaker points, all receiving a moderate rating of 3.

Exceptional marks were awarded for its prime **location**, receiving a perfect 5. The university also scored well in **facilities** and **internationality**, both earning 4s. Conversely, the **professors** received the lowest rating at 2.5. **Student life**, **accommodation**, and **value** all received solid mid-range scores of 3.5.

Nothing to show

Overall, this university garners positive feedback with consistent ratings across most aspects. Its strongest area is **Location**, receiving a perfect score of 5. Conversely, while still strong, **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** all received a solid rating of 4, indicating areas that are well-regarded but could potentially see further enhancement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.29/5 average rating, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students praise flexible schedules, excellent and knowledgeable professors, and valuable career-relevant subjects. No negative reviews were provided.

This university receives predominantly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students highlight affordability, national recognition, and the flexibility of distance learning as key strengths.

With a 4/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight high-quality faculty and well-designed career plans with great instructors. A unique degree catalog and community involvement opportunities were also mentioned.

With a 4/5 average rating from two reviews, nearly 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight academic excellence and a welcoming environment, with the Faculty of Administration noted for its practical approach.

Nothing to show

With one review, the National University of Costa Rica earns a 4/5 average. The feedback highlights a rewarding experience with a challenging yet engaging curriculum and supportive faculty. An athletic scholarship was also mentioned.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
43%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
4★
43%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
14%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close