Instituto Tecnológico Superior de San Pedro de las Colonias - Tec San Pedro vs Universidad Anáhuac vs DCU Business School vs Universidad Panamericana vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 53 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Odlar Yurdu University (5.00)
Instituto Tecnológico Superior de San Pedro de las Colonias - Tec San Pedro: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 2/6 categories
DCU Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Panamericana: wins 1/6 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Ironhack: wins 2/6 categories
Odlar Yurdu University: wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Communication
Dublin, Ireland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Aguascalientes, Mexico
4.10
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Baku, Azerbaijan
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Language for Intercultural Communication
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Location
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
Not rated
4.41
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
4.59
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
Not rated
4.63
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Value
Not rated
4.63
Win
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Accommodation
Not rated
4.66
Win
Not rated
3.75
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive atmosphere and competent, caring teachers
  • +Comprehensive programs and well-maintained facilities
  • +Staff accessibility and student support
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
  • +Strong business programs and professional connections
  • +Personalized attention and strong sense of community

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Supportive professors and practical learning experiences.
  • +Strong academic foundation in English Language Teaching.
Cons
  • -Arrogant teachers and lack of student support, especially for evening classes.
  • -Obscure career guidance and insufficient preparation for the job market.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.

Nothing to show

  • -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
  • -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
  • -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of student support and feedback is a significant concern.
Rating summary
What students say

With uniformly average scores across all assessed aspects, the university presents a consistent but unremarkable profile. No specific area stands out as particularly strong or weak, indicating a balanced, albeit unexceptional, experience for students in facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality. The value for money also reflects this middling performance.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Nothing to show

The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution excels in several key aspects, with outstanding ratings for **Location** and **Internationality**. Student life and professors also receive strong marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The primary area of concern, however, is **Accommodation**, which received the lowest possible score. The value proposition and facilities are rated positively, suggesting a generally favorable offering.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3.2/5 average rating, roughly 40% of reviews are negative. Positive feedback highlights excellent atmosphere and competent, caring teachers. Negative points mention arrogant staff and insufficient support for certain student groups.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

This university has received one 5-star review, indicating a highly positive experience. The student highlighted a strong academic program, supportive professors, and practical experience opportunities. No negative feedback was provided.

Rating distribution
5★
40%
67%
0%
33%
0%
50%
100%
4★
0%
39%
0%
58%
0%
0%
0%
3★
20%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
20%
0%
0%
8%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close