Instituto Universitario de Tecnología Dr. Cristóbal Mendoza - IUTCM vs Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University - ATBU, Bauchi vs Université Abdelhamid Mehri Constantine 2 vs Federal Polytechnic Bauchi - FPTB vs Houdegbe North American University of Benin

Side-by-side comparison from 23 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Instituto Universitario de Tecnología Dr. Cristóbal Mendoza - IUTCM: wins 0/7 categories
Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University - ATBU, Bauchi: wins 1/7 categories
Université Abdelhamid Mehri Constantine 2: wins 0/7 categories
Federal Polytechnic Bauchi - FPTB: wins 4/7 categories
Houdegbe North American University of Benin: wins 1/7 categories
Potchefstroom Academy and SAAHST - Potch Academy : wins 1/7 categories
Sa'adu Zungur University - SAZU: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Geology
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: International Relations and Global Affairs
Best programme: Fragrance and Beauty
Best programme: Chemistry
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.93
Win
Not rated
3.67
3.00
3.00
3.00
Location
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
2.00
3.00
Professors
Not rated
4.44
Not rated
4.67
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.63
Not rated
4.33
Win
3.00
3.00
1.00
Student life
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
2.00
3.00
Value
Not rated
4.44
Not rated
4.67
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.47
Not rated
4.00
Win
2.00
3.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent teachers
  • +Good career prospects
  • +Excellent infrastructure
  • +Friendly and supportive lecturers and positive student-lecturer relationships.
  • +Conducive and serene learning environment with technology focus.
  • +Affordable tuition fees and practical, relevant course delivery.

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent quality of education and impactful learning.
  • +Diverse programs and experienced faculty.
  • +Respectful and inclusive environment with friendly professors.
  • +English-taught programs and international focus
  • +Convenient location near amenities and the beach
  • +Engaging lectures and passionate faculty
  • +High-quality training and learning experiences
  • +Dedicated, quality education from lecturers
  • +Supportive environment valuing students
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequent sources of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support from faculty and staff are often mentioned.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a constant problem.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty and administration create frustration.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date with industry demands.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently mentioned.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students causes dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and poor communication lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -A lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling unsupported.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leads to student dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform rating across all assessed aspects. Consequently, no particular strengths or weaknesses can be identified within the provided data. The university received identical scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, indicating an average or baseline performance across the board.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths, particularly in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring an impressive 4.44. **Student Life** also receives high marks at 4.4. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.47. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range.

Nothing to show

This institution receives high marks across most aspects, notably excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Professors and Value are also strong performers, both rated highly. Accommodation is well-regarded, and Internationality scores are positive. The weakest area appears to be Facilities, which received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

Overall, this university presents a commendable profile with significant strengths, particularly in its **value**, where it achieved a perfect score. **Professors**, **location**, and **student life** are also rated highly. The university's weakest area is **accommodation**, receiving a score of 2. **Facilities** and **internationality** fall into the mid-range with scores of 3.

Academic strengths are evident, with professors receiving a perfect score of 5. Value for money also stands out at 4. However, the university faces challenges in its location and student life, both scoring a low 2. Facilities and accommodation are rated moderately at 3, as is internationality. Overall, the institution excels in teaching quality but has areas needing significant improvement in campus experience and accessibility.

This institution garners strong marks in areas like Professors and Value, both receiving a rating of 4. Conversely, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker aspect, with a score of just 1. Other surveyed categories, including Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation, all received a consistent rating of 3, suggesting a mid-range performance in these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the university is rated a perfect 5/5. This feedback highlighted excellent teachers, strong career prospects, and ideal infrastructure. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 4.44/5 from 16 reviews, ~88% are positive. Students praise friendly lecturers, conducive learning environments, and relevant practical/theory teachings. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the quality of education, diverse programs, and experienced faculty, with ~100% positive feedback.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being highly favorable. Students praise its completely English-taught programs and desirable location near the beach.

The single review is positive, rating 4/5. It praises engaging lectures, campus passion, and quality training. A minor suggestion was made for updating machinery and improving cleanliness in the wellness center.

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is predominantly positive (~100% favorable). Students highlight dedicated lecturers, quality education, and a supportive environment. Limited negative feedback exists, with one mention of lacking infrastructural amenities.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
56%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
31%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
3★
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close