Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ vs Universidad Técnica de Manabí - UTM vs Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES vs Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati - IITT vs Universidad de las Américas - UDLA

Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Meridian University (5.00)
Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad Técnica de Manabí - UTM: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES: wins 1/3 categories
Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati - IITT: wins 2/3 categories
Universidad de las Américas - UDLA: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad Católica de Cuenca: wins 0/3 categories
Meridian University: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Music
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: IT Management
Best programme: Interior Design
Los Angeles, California, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.32
3.00
4.80
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.32
4.00
5.00
4.00
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.27
4.00
4.60
5.00
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.14
3.00
4.40
5.00
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Student life
4.36
3.00
4.60
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.10
3.00
4.60
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
3.88
4.00
4.40
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Holistic and diverse academic programs.
  • +Excellent professors and personal/professional growth.
  • +Beautiful campus and vibrant student community.

Nothing to show

  • +Exceptional professors and learning environment
  • +Great opportunities and supportive community
  • +Excellent resources and hands-on learning
  • +cutting-edge IT knowledge
  • +top-tier learning environment
  • +Inspiring and enriching academic experiences
  • +Access to useful digital tools and apps
  • +Fantastic campus facilities

Nothing to show

  • +exceptional, supportive faculty
  • +transformative, holistic program approach
  • +intellectual rigor and personal growth
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major issue.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common point of dissatisfaction.
  • -Lack of support and resources hinder academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -A lack of clear communication and support exacerbates problems.
Rating summary
What students say

Students generally hold the university in high regard, with excellent scores for Student Life (4.36) and Location (4.32). Facilities also received a strong rating of 4.32. While professors (4.27) and internationality (4.14) are also well-received, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a rating of 3.88. Value for money is rated a respectable 4.10.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks across the board, this institution shines brightest in its prime **Location**, achieving a perfect score. Students also praise its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering.

This institution garners outstanding scores in several key areas, including professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all receiving a perfect 5 out of 5. Facilities and location also score well, achieving a commendable 4. The weakest area, though still strong, is facilities, indicating room for minor improvement in this aspect.

This institution garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving 4.5 out of 5. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. Similarly, **Value** is rated a solid 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is **Facilities** at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across multiple dimensions.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, internationality, and value. These strengths suggest a robust academic environment with excellent accessibility and global outlook, all at a high value for students. Conversely, the university's weakest points are its facilities, student life, and accommodation, all of which scored zero. This indicates significant areas for improvement in campus infrastructure, social engagement, and housing provisions.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.42/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's holistic curriculum, excellent professors, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted excellent professors, dynamic classes, and great learning opportunities. The university also received praise for its infrastructure and student well-being support.

This university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback, with its Information Technology program highlighted as outstanding. The average rating is 4/5, with approximately 100% of reviews being positive.

Students report enriching and inspiring experiences, particularly in areas like Interior Design and historical home restoration. The university provides helpful tools for progress, though some find navigating the campus and dining options challenging. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With a 5/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The single review praises the transformative PhD program, highlighting exceptional faculty and unique educational approaches. No negative feedback was provided.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
67%
0%
50%
0%
100%
4★
42%
0%
33%
100%
50%
0%
0%
3★
8%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close