London School of Commerce - LSC vs Nilai University vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs NEXT Academy vs Universiti Teknologi Malaysia - UTM

Side-by-side comparison from 32 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: National University of Malaysia (5.00)
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/7 categories
Nilai University: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/7 categories
NEXT Academy: wins 0/7 categories
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia - UTM: wins 2/7 categories
University of Malaya - UM: wins 1/7 categories
National University of Malaysia: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
4.20
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
4.56
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.90
4.00
Location
4.75
Not rated
4.78
Not rated
4.29
4.80
5.00
Win
Professors
3.25
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
4.00
4.20
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.88
3.80
4.00
Student life
3.75
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.71
4.50
Win
4.00
Value
2.75
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.25
Win
4.20
4.00
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
3.22
Not rated
3.86
Win
3.60
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network

Nothing to show

  • +Exceptional professors and staff with strong industry connections
  • +Modern and well-maintained campus facilities and learning spaces
  • +Supportive academic environment with an emphasis on research
  • +Prestigious global and local reputation
  • +High-quality, practical learning experiences
  • +Vibrant campus life with diverse activities
  • +Supportive supervisors and academic environment
  • +Ample research opportunities and facilities
Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Students dislike the strict and financially burdensome penalty system.
  • -Unhelpful and rude staff members are a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently mentioned.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment cause significant frustration.
  • -A lack of clear communication and support is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

Nothing to show

The university presents a solid overall profile, excelling in its **location** and **value** with high ratings. **Facilities** and **professors** also received strong scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is **student life**, indicating room for potential enhancement in that aspect. Other categories like accommodation and internationality are well-regarded.

A standout performer, the university excels particularly in its **Location** (4.8) and **Student Life** (4.5). **Professors** (4.2) and **Value** (4.2) also receive strong marks. The primary area for improvement lies with **Accomodation** (3.6), which is the lowest-rated category. **Facilities** (3.9) and **Internationality** (3.8) fall within a moderate range.

This university excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its professors and location. Student life and internationality are also strong, with ratings of 4. While facilities and value are well-regarded at 4, the accommodation rating stands out as a significant weakness at 0.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

Nothing to show

Approximately 87.5% of reviews are positive, praising exceptional professors, strong industry connections, and a supportive academic environment. One review expressed dissatisfaction with faculty management and late registration penalties.

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% highlight the university's prestige, strong global and employer reputation, and diverse multicultural environment. There is minimal negative feedback.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This indicates overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of comments highlighting strong research opportunities and a supportive academic environment. No negative feedback was received.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
67%
0%
50%
40%
100%
4★
25%
0%
33%
0%
38%
40%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close