Chennai Business School - CBS vs SRM University vs Christ University Bangalore vs Ethiraj College for Women vs Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research

Side-by-side comparison from 68 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Chennai Business School - CBS: wins 0/2 categories
SRM University: wins 0/2 categories
Christ University Bangalore: wins 0/2 categories
Ethiraj College for Women: wins 0/2 categories
Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research: wins 1/2 categories
Manonmaniam Sundaranar University: wins 1/2 categories
St.Peter's College of Engineering and Technology - SPCET: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Chennai, India
4.30
Read more reviews
32 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Commerce in Accounting
Best programme: Mathematics
Best programme: Physics
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.88
3.83
4.00
5.00
5.00
2.00
Location
Not rated
3.47
3.69
4.50
5.00
5.00
3.00
Professors
Not rated
3.50
3.77
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.50
3.84
4.00
4.00
4.00
1.00
Student life
Not rated
3.93
3.73
5.00
5.00
5.00
3.00
Value
Not rated
3.88
3.77
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
3.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.81
3.07
3.00
3.00
5.00
Win
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality education and helpful, experienced professors.
  • +Excellent exposure through diverse programs and industry-aligned curriculum.
  • +Strong focus on placements and practical learning experiences.
  • +Strong academic curriculum and quality education
  • +Holistic development through internships and co-curricular activities
  • +Disciplined and structured environment with ample opportunities
  • +Inspiring and supportive atmosphere with invested faculty and administration.
  • +Empowerment and exposure leading to confidence and vision.
  • +Equal encouragement of academics, sports, and cultural activities.
  • +Diverse course offerings and in-depth syllabus
  • +Supportive and effective teaching staff
  • +Equal opportunities for academic and extracurricular pursuits
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
  • +Well-equipped labs and effective curriculum
  • +Enjoyable campus life

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Biased faculty and unfair grading practices.
  • -Poor campus life and lack of support for genuine talent.
  • -Strict rules and lack of freedom hinder student experience.
  • -Outdated curriculum and unhelpful faculty lead to poor academic outcomes.
  • -Administrative issues and poor management create a frustrating environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support from staff are consistently mentioned.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of career support and job opportunities is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support leaves students feeling unsupported.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution achieves strong performance, particularly in Student Life, with a rating of 3.93. Facilities and Value also score highly at 3.875. The university's Location, however, received the lowest rating at 3.47, alongside Professors and Internationality which both scored 3.5. Accommodations also received a solid rating of 3.81.

With the highest scores in **Facilities** and **Internationality** (both 3.83), this university excels in providing resources and fostering a global environment. It also garners strong marks for its **Professors** and **Value**. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.06, indicating an area that could benefit from improvement. Overall, the institution presents a solid academic and social offering with room for enhancement in student housing.

This institution scores exceptionally well in key areas such as **student life and professors**, both receiving a perfect 5. Its location and overall value are also highly regarded at 4.5. Conversely, accommodation stands out as its weakest point, with a rating of 3. Facilities and internationality are rated solidly at 4.

This institution excels in several key areas, earning perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, student life, and overall value. However, its accommodation receives a lower rating, indicating room for improvement in this specific aspect. Internationality is also a strong point, though not reaching the maximum score.

This institution receives near-perfect scores across the board, reflecting outstanding performance in its facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation, all scoring a perfect five. While still strong, the university's internationality and value received slightly lower, though still excellent, ratings of four.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

University reviews are predominantly positive, with an average rating of 4.34/5. Students praise the quality of education, helpful faculty, and good environment. A small portion (~3%) expressed concerns about campus life and faculty bias.

Approximately 84% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, holistic development, and good opportunities. Around 16% of feedback mentions rigidity and a lack of flexibility.

With an average rating of 5/5, these reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight an inspiring and supportive atmosphere, with faculty and administration invested in their journeys. They also praise cultural festivals and a sense of empowerment and vision.

With one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. This positive feedback (~100%) highlighted excellent opportunities for studies and sports, along with good and friendly teachers and effective teaching methods.

With an average rating of 4/5, the single review highlights positive curriculum coverage, supportive staff, and good labs. Infrastructure and syllabus advancement are areas noted for improvement, representing ~0% negative feedback.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
56%
19%
100%
100%
0%
0%
4★
0%
28%
55%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
13%
10%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
3%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close