EU Business School vs Sustainability Management School - SUMAS vs EHL Hospitality Business School - EHL vs University of Geneva - UNIGE vs International Academy of Sport Management and Technology - AISTS
Side-by-side comparison from 337 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Engaging and knowledgeable instructors
- +Relevant and practical course content
- +Supportive and collaborative learning environment
- +Real-world application and engaging teaching methods
- +International mobility and internship opportunities
- +Strong sense of community and alumni support
- +Multicultural environment and diverse colleagues
- +High-quality faculty with industry experience and strong academic reputation
- +Practical career preparation and enhanced job opportunities
- +Comprehensive sports industry immersion
- +Networking and real-world connections
- +Diverse and international cohort
- +Engaging, flexible courses and well-designed digital campus
- +Supportive and responsive professors
- +Valuable professional development opportunities
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of transparency in grading and unresponsiveness to student concerns.
- -The school's accreditation and recognition are questionable.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured by many students.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities are a common complaint.
- -Many students feel there is a lack of career support and networking opportunities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and engagement from staff is disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment detract from the learning experience.
- -A lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
Overall, the university presents a mixed performance across various aspects. The strongest areas are the professors and internationality, both receiving a solid 3.33 rating. In contrast, student life and accommodation are the weakest points, scoring a low 1. However, facilities and value also lag behind with scores of 1.33, while location sits at a moderate 2.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Internationality with a near-perfect 4.93 rating. Student life and facilities also score very strongly, both above 4.7. The university's weakest area, though still good, is its Location, rated at 4.28. Overall, the ratings indicate a well-rounded university with a particular strength in its global appeal and student experience.
An analysis of university ratings reveals a strong international focus and exceptional value, both scoring very high. The institution also excels in the quality of its professors. Among the surveyed aspects, student life received the lowest, though still positive, rating. Facilities and accommodation were also rated favorably, indicating a well-rounded student experience.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, receiving the highest marks in these areas. Facilities and professors also scored very well, indicating a high standard of academic and physical resources. Student life is rated positively, though not as high as the top-performing categories. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which received the lowest score, suggesting room for improvement in student housing offerings. Overall value is rated favorably.
This institution excels in several key areas, receiving top marks for its Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value. However, significant weaknesses are evident in its Facilities and Accommodation, both of which received the lowest possible score. This suggests a strong academic and social experience, but a considerable need for improvement in infrastructure and housing.
Nothing to show
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
All three reviews are negative (100%), with an average rating of 1/5. Recurring themes include unrecognized degrees, poor administration with unresponsiveness and lack of transparency in grading, and disorganized, unprofessional management.
With a ~95% positive rating (4.79/5), reviews highlight excellent opportunities and strong personal growth. No negative feedback was reported among the 61 reviews.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight multicultural environments, well-organized programs, and knowledgeable professors who are experts in their fields. The curriculum prepares students well for the job market.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (average 4.67/5) highlights program organization, networking opportunities, and comprehensive coverage of the sports industry. Some mention high living costs in Lausanne.
The sole review offers a perfect 5/5 rating, highlighting a well-made digital campus, engaging and flexible courses, and prompt professor support. This single positive feedback suggests an excellent experience with ~100% satisfaction.
Nothing to show
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
1. Kindly note, it is a registered private school only, but the degrees are school-issued, not officially recognized Swiss university degrees. They are relying on the entry-tier US accreditor ACBSP itself, which is well below AACSB/EQUIS/AMBA/HEdA accreditation. So please do not be confused thinking it is a proper Swiss university. 2. Actually the school is more like a small company only, having less than 5 staff members on site. And one thing I must tell, before enrollment they are very friendly, but after joining the friendliness is finishing. 3. In the classes there are hardly 5 students at master's and bachelor's level, and many times nobody is even coming to the campus. On top of that, the teachers/staffs seemed to get fired in the middle of the semester itself. 4. One more important thing , the grades are coming from the the founder or staffs directly, very subjective and no transparency at all. The professors are not even having the right to decide the final grade!! How can this be acceptable, I am asking? 5. Now they have started selling online courses also. So I will not be surprised if one fine day they are closing the campus fully and doing only online business.
Choosing EHL was a very intentional decision for me. As an extroverted person passionate about hospitality, I wanted a university where service excellence is not only taught but truly practiced. EHL stood out because of its balance between academic rigor and hands-on experience. The AP (preparatory year) program had a big impact on me. Working in operational roles such as fine dining service, front office, pastry taught me discipline, attention to detail, and how to perform under pressure. It gave me real confidence in guest interaction and teamwork. Academically, I especially enjoyed classes related to financial accounting and economics as they helped me better understand how people and businesses function together. EHL’s career support also made a real difference. The interview preparation and guidance helped me secure my Front Office internship at Jumeirah Marsa Al Arab, which was a major opportunity for me. What makes EHL distinctive is its international environment and high standards. You’re constantly surrounded by ambitious, driven students, which pushes me to grow both personally and professionally. My advice to future students is to fully embrace the operational experience; it builds resilience and professionalism that truly sets you apart.
It is true that a diploma from a Swiss university isn't easy to get, but it is totally profitable. First, this program gives us opportunities to meet prestigious Swiss businessmen and businesswomen. Plus our professors are well-known and are the best in their domain. With a diploma from UNIGE, we have a career assured, especially if we want to work in Switzerland (one of the countries with the highest wages), but also internationally. Our university is located in the international city of Geneva, we can enjoy the little but pleasant student life with students from all around the world.
The 15 months at AISTS were truly enlightening. What sets this program apart is its exceptional support system, offering unparalleled professional guidance and prioritizing mental health and wellness.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
