St. Paul's University - SPU vs University of Eldoret vs Kenya Methodist University - KeMU vs Murang'a University of Technology - mut vs Laikipia University

Side-by-side comparison from 84 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Eldoret (4.80)
St. Paul's University - SPU: wins 3/7 categories
University of Eldoret: wins 0/7 categories
Kenya Methodist University - KeMU: wins 2/7 categories
Murang'a University of Technology - mut: wins 1/7 categories
Laikipia University: wins 0/7 categories
Kenya Institute of Mass Communication - KIMC: wins 1/7 categories
Kenya Medical Training College: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration and Operations Management
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Statistics and Programming
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Best programme: Agriculture
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Best programme: Environmental Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.63
Win
4.41
4.41
4.50
3.20
4.00
3.75
Location
4.60
4.71
4.72
4.10
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Professors
4.50
4.39
4.53
Win
4.50
4.20
4.00
4.00
Internationality
4.27
4.28
4.26
4.30
Win
2.80
4.00
3.00
Student life
4.71
Win
4.53
4.56
4.40
3.40
3.00
2.75
Value
4.73
4.67
4.79
Win
4.50
4.00
4.50
4.25
Accommodation
4.58
Win
4.31
4.41
4.44
2.75
3.50
2.25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive, approachable, and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Peaceful, positive learning environment and personal growth focus
  • +Quality education and strong academic performance leading to career success
  • +Supportive and devoted lecturers
  • +Opportunities for innovation and career growth
  • +Positive campus environment and diverse student body
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers
  • +Supportive learning environment and academic support
  • +Positive campus experience and engaging lessons
  • +Dedicated, supportive lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment
  • +Technological advancements and innovation
  • +Practical learning and quality education in key programs
  • +Conducive, serene, and quiet learning environment
  • +Welcoming and helpful staff
  • +Practical skills development for career readiness
  • +Personal and talent growth opportunities
  • +Dedicated and committed lecturers
  • +Clear learning objectives and practical skill development
  • +Slow administrative processes
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is prevalent.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality are often perceived as poor or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication with staff and instructors is frequently poor.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from staff are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates excellent performance in student life, achieving a high rating of 4.71. Value for money and facilities also scored very well, at 4.73 and 4.63 respectively. Internationality stands out as the area with the lowest score, at 4.27, suggesting room for growth in this aspect. Overall, the institution presents a strong offering with a particularly vibrant student experience.

This institution receives particularly high marks for its **location** (4.71) and **value** (4.67), indicating these are key strengths. **Student life** also scores well at 4.53. The **facilities** (4.41), **professors** (4.39), and **accommodation** (4.31) are all rated positively. The area with the lowest score, though still respectable, is **internationality** (4.28).

An overall strong performance is evident for the university. Location and Value stand out as its strongest areas, receiving the highest scores. Internationality, while still rated positively, appears to be the weakest aspect compared to other categories. Facilities and Accommodation share the same moderate rating, with Professors and Student Life scoring slightly higher.

This institution receives strong marks across the board, with particularly high scores for Facilities and Professors, both at 4.5. Student Life and Accommodation are also well-regarded, scoring 4.4 and 4.44 respectively. Internationality is rated at 4.3, while the Location stands out as the relatively weakest area, scoring 4.1. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with excellent academic and student experience components.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings and overall value, with particularly high ratings for Professors (4.2) and Value (4). Conversely, the university faces challenges in its Accommodation (2.75) and Internationality (2.8) scores, indicating areas for potential improvement to enhance the student experience. Other aspects like Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately.

This university garners excellent scores for its location, achieving a perfect 5. Its facilities and professors also stand out with strong 4-star ratings, complemented by a solid 4.5 for value. Areas for development include student life and accommodation, both scoring a respectable 3 to 3.5 stars. Internationality also received a positive 4-star rating.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas, with **Value** and **Location** receiving the highest scores at 4.25 and 4 respectively. Professors are also well-regarded, averaging a 4. While facilities and internationality are rated moderately, student life and accommodation represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 2.75 and 2.25, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.54/5 average rating and ~0% negative feedback across 26 reviews, students praise St. Paul's University's supportive lecturers, practical courses, and peaceful learning environment, fostering personal and professional growth.

With an average rating of 4.78/5, approximately 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise brilliant, supportive lecturers and a great environment, though some mention limited resources like internet and computers, and the cold weather.

All 19 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise knowledgeable and helpful lecturers, a supportive learning environment, and academic rigor. Some suggest minor improvements to facilities and student services.

Students consistently praise Murang'a University of Technology for its dedicated and supportive lecturers who facilitate timely syllabus completion. They also highlight the clean, safe, and vibrant campus environment with strong technological investment, contributing to quality education.

With an average rating of 4.4/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students praise the quality education, practical learning, and dedicated faculty, especially in Agriculture, Education, and Business Studies. The serene learning environment and well-equipped facilities are also highlighted.

With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, students highlight strong practical skill development and opportunities to foster personal talents. No negative comments were received.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 4 reviews, ~75% are positive. Students praise opportunities for growth, skill development, and committed lecturers. Some noted slow registration processes and poor food quality, with limited options.

Rating distribution
5★
54%
78%
53%
60%
60%
0%
25%
4★
46%
22%
47%
40%
20%
100%
50%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
25%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

School as a flame of knowledge.

It is a good place to learn and fully explore your career. What I like is the commitment of the staff to make the school a better place. And what I dislike is the cold weather that makes school experience bad ,at times. I recommend that the school to have enough infrastructure for the well being of the students especially the lecture hall seats.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close