Democritus University of Thrace vs University of Crete - UOC vs Technical University of Crete - TUC vs Technological Educational Institute (TEI) of Crete vs Metropolitan College - AMC

Side-by-side comparison from 104 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Democritus University of Thrace: wins 0/5 categories
University of Crete - UOC: wins 0/5 categories
Technical University of Crete - TUC: wins 0/5 categories
Technological Educational Institute (TEI) of Crete: wins 0/5 categories
Metropolitan College - AMC: wins 1/5 categories
Deree Graduate Education: wins 0/5 categories
Anatolia American University: wins 4/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Electrical and Computer Engineering
Best programme: Biology
Best programme: Engineering
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: International Hospitality and Tourism Management
Best programme: MA in Learning Design and Technology – Online
Best programme: Political Science and International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
3.28
3.65
2.00
4.00
5.00
4.89
5.00
Location
3.28
3.65
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.80
5.00
Professors
3.65
4.18
3.50
4.50
4.00
4.77
5.00
Win
Internationality
2.61
2.88
2.00
3.50
3.00
4.69
5.00
Win
Student life
3.74
3.71
3.00
4.00
5.00
Win
4.78
4.00
Value
3.85
3.94
2.50
4.50
3.00
4.85
5.00
Win
Accommodation
2.91
2.44
1.50
4.50
3.00
4.50
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive faculty and helpful peers
  • +Engaging courses and diverse opportunities
  • +Central campus location with modern facilities
  • +Knowledgeable and helpful professors
  • +Opportunities for interdisciplinary study and research
  • +High academic standards and excellent facilities
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and applied concepts
  • +High-quality, knowledgeable, and inspiring educators
  • +Relevant, evolving curriculum aligned with industry trends
  • +Practical learning and industry exposure
  • +Supportive and experienced faculty
  • +Vibrant campus and community
  • +Helpful study guides and supportive teachers
  • +Excellent library resources
  • +High-quality, experienced, and supportive faculty
  • +Relevant, practical, and engaging course content
  • +Excellent value and embedded certifications
  • +Engaging classes and stimulating multicultural environment
  • +Excellent facilities and supportive student services
  • +Strong academic reputation and student success focus
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient equipment impact learning experiences.
  • -Poor quality and limited variety of food options are a significant issue.
  • -Lack of professor engagement and administrative shortcomings hinder student progress.
  • -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management chaos with outdated program information.
  • -Inadequate and impractical computer-based instruction.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support disappoints students.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty and staff are recurring problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance lead to an unpleasant environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent concern.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university presents a mixed but largely positive review. Student life and value for money stand out as its strongest aspects, both receiving high marks. Conversely, internationality and accommodation appear to be the areas needing the most improvement, indicated by significantly lower ratings. Facilities and location fall within a moderate range of student satisfaction.

This institution achieves its highest marks in professor quality, with a rating of 4.18. Value for money also scores well at 3.94. Conversely, accommodation presents the most significant area for improvement, receiving a low rating of 2.44. Internationality and facilities are mid-range at 2.88 and 3.65 respectively, while student life sits at 3.71.

This institution garners its highest marks for **Location**, scoring a commendable 4 out of 5. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the most significant challenge, with a low rating of 1.5. Other areas like Professors and Student Life fall within the mid-range, while Facilities and Internationality also received moderate scores. The overall value proposition is rated at 2.5.

This institution receives excellent marks in several key areas, particularly its outstanding location, which earned a perfect score. Professors and accommodation were also highly rated at 4.5. Facilities and student life are solid at 4. The weakest area, internationality, sits at 3.5, though value for money remains strong at 4.5.

This institution shines particularly bright in its facilities, location, and student life, all receiving top marks. Professors also garnered strong approval. However, areas for development include accommodation, internationality, and overall value, which received moderate ratings.

This institution garners impressive scores across most metrics. Notably, its **Facilities** and **Location** are standout strengths, both receiving near-perfect marks. **Value** is also highly rated. The university's **Accomodation** shows the most room for improvement, indicated by its lowest score, though it remains a respectable 4.5. Overall, feedback suggests a well-rounded university experience with particularly strong physical and geographical advantages.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength across multiple key areas. Facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received a perfect 5-star rating. The only slight dip is noted in student life, which scored a still-positive 4 stars.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting great tutors, a supportive community, and engaging programs. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with outdated facilities and some professors' attitudes or teaching skills.

With ~82% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.24/5, students praise knowledgeable and helpful faculty, diverse course options, and good research opportunities. No negative feedback was recorded.

Most reviews are positive (~75%), highlighting practical workshops and excellent teachers. A minority (~25%) mention poor organization and lack of support during lab projects.

Reviews are predominantly positive, with ~74% giving high ratings. Students praise the real-world learning focus, practical skills development, and supportive faculty. The campus environment and location are also highlighted as strengths. Minimal negative feedback exists regarding older buildings and bureaucracy.

With one 5-star review, the feedback is ~100% positive. Students highlight helpful teachers and extensive library resources.

With a 4.69/5 average rating from 13 reviews, all feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent program value, high-quality and supportive faculty, and engaging, realistic course content as key strengths.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight engaging classes, a stimulating multicultural environment, and excellent facilities, with approximately 0% negative reviews.

Rating distribution
5★
16%
42%
25%
14%
100%
69%
100%
4★
51%
39%
50%
57%
0%
31%
0%
3★
27%
18%
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
2★
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Great experience in general, still things to improve.

I’m an undergraduate student of Applied Mathematics. After years on the campus, I’ve liked the facilities a lot, and I think they’re the best in the country. I’ve also liked the knowledge coverage that the studies offer on the subject. The help from the profs is mixed. Some are helpful and nice but many deliver an impersonal way of teaching so students are left filling their blanks by themselves. The organizing of exams could be better if students and profs could find the best dates on the calendar without making it every-day-examine sometimes which can be stressful. Finally, some of the first subjects that you have to take are very crowded and students tend to sit by the back without a seat or being left out.

Wholesome education inovative programs

I liked the many workshop hours. Almost all classes had workshop hours and there the ideas and concepts discussed in the class were materialised and deemed practical and functional. O woukd recommended this university for the open minded you do not want limitations to what they can learn or how

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Excellent Value for Money MA TESOL

I did a lot of research before landing on ACG as my choice to do an MA TESOL programme. Firstly, I found the course very good value for money, especially as they offer the Trinity Cert embedded in the programme, a certificate which allows you to teach in most parts of the world. Secondly, I really appreciate the hybrid online

The multicultural environment

I think it should be considered one of the top institutions of Thessaloniki. The classes are engaging and the multicultural environment is very stimulating. The overall facilities are in excellent condition and the university is always willing to help the students excel.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close