ESAD Escola Superior de Arte Dramático de Galicia vs Universidad Metropolitana de Monterrey - UMM vs University of Wisconsin Oshkosh - UW Oshkosh vs Lupane State University vs Great Zimbabwe University

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ESAD Escola Superior de Arte Dramático de Galicia (5.00)
ESAD Escola Superior de Arte Dramático de Galicia: wins 5/7 categories
Universidad Metropolitana de Monterrey - UMM: wins 0/7 categories
University of Wisconsin Oshkosh - UW Oshkosh: wins 2/7 categories
Lupane State University: wins 0/7 categories
Great Zimbabwe University: wins 0/7 categories
National University of Science and Technology - Nust: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Arts and Sciences
Oshkosh Wisconsin, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Art and Design
Best programme: B.A. in Philosophy
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
4.75
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.67
Location
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.25
3.00
3.00
4.67
Professors
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.25
3.00
4.00
4.67
Internationality
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.25
1.00
4.00
3.67
Student life
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
1.00
4.00
3.67
Value
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
2.00
4.00
4.33
Accommodation
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
1.00
4.00
4.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent teachers and academic support leading to great results.
  • +Pleasant and clean campus environment.
  • +Affordable food options.
  • +Dedicated teachers and responsive administration
  • +Value for money despite fee increases
  • +Support for student feedback
  • +Supportive faculty and advisors
  • +Diverse and inclusive campus culture
  • +Opportunities for personal and academic growth

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and approachable lecturers
  • +Opportunities for academic and personal growth
  • +Positive academic environment
  • +Strong technical programmes and practical learning opportunities
  • +Dedicated, qualified, and supportive lecturers
  • +Modern facilities and a vibrant campus environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major concerns.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often seen as unsatisfactory.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources were a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of engagement and outdated curriculum led to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -The quality and relevance of course content are frequently questioned.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of student support and resources is a significant problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent problem.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of transparency create uncertainty and dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves exceptional scores in several key areas, notably in its **professors, location, student life, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving perfect marks. Its facilities are also rated highly. The primary area for potential improvement lies in **accommodation**, which received a moderate rating compared to the other exceptional categories.

Offering a consistent score of zero across all evaluated categories, this institution presents a uniform picture in its current ratings. There are no distinct strengths or weaknesses to highlight, as all aspects, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, are rated equally low.

This institution excels in several areas, notably achieving a perfect score for Accomodation and a very high rating for Facilities. Student life and professors also received positive marks. Internationality is identified as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating. Overall, the university presents a strong offering, with its value and location also being significant strengths.

Nothing to show

Across a range of evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all receiving a solid rating of 4. Professors also earned a commendable rating of 4. The areas with the lowest scores, indicating room for improvement, are facilities and location, both rated at 3.

Across various metrics, this institution receives commendations, particularly for its exceptional professors and prime location, both scoring highly. Student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, indicated by lower ratings. Facilities also present a moderately good but not outstanding aspect. Accommodation and value for money are rated quite favorably, suggesting a positive overall experience in these regards.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With one review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights excellent teachers, a good campus, and affordable amenities. There is no negative feedback to report.

The sole review is positive, rating the university 4 out of 5 stars. It praises good teachers who care about student learning, while also noting consistent tuition fee increases.

All feedback is positive, with students praising academic advising, well-ordered degrees, and instructor support. The campus design and smaller class sizes facilitating one-on-one professor interaction are also highlighted.

Nothing to show

With a single review, the university received a 4/5 rating. The feedback highlighted a positive academic environment, dedicated and approachable lecturers, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. Minor areas for improvement in resources and infrastructure were noted.

The university is highly praised for its academic excellence, practical learning opportunities, and career preparation. All feedback is positive, reflecting strong satisfaction with quality instruction and facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
0%
25%
0%
0%
33%
4★
0%
100%
75%
0%
100%
67%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reputable, Respected and Recognized world wide

My experience a NUST was a time to remember. I was in the engineering department. Lecturers were always on time for lecturers, and work and assignments were given and marked. I am the engineer I am owing to the dedication by the chemical engineering lecturers. Quality notes and lecturers are given as well as projects supervision and guidance. Even years after I have graduated, they are still available to give letters of recommendation as per request. My degree is recognized everywhere l have been and l recently got accredited as a professional engineer with ECSA based on my experience and academic background. Campus life as an engineering student is quite dull to be honest, best indulge in sports. During my time I took part in Basketball and athletics. They had transport from campus to the practice courts as the university didn't have an onsite basketball court. As for the ZUSA games where we meet with other universities to compete, I give that 1 star as we had to sleep in the bus over a two-day trip. I don't know if that has improved as resources were truly limited

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close