Universidad Anáhuac vs Instituto de Ciencias y Estudios Superiores de Tamaulipas - ICEST vs Tecnológico Nacional de México vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 46 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tecnológico Nacional de México (5.00)
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 1/4 categories
Instituto de Ciencias y Estudios Superiores de Tamaulipas - ICEST: wins 0/4 categories
Tecnológico Nacional de México: wins 1/4 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/4 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/4 categories
Ironhack: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas: wins 1/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Location
4.50
Not rated
5.00
4.75
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.41
Not rated
4.00
4.63
Win
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Internationality
4.59
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.63
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Student life
4.63
Not rated
5.00
3.88
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Value
4.63
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.13
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.66
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Relevant and comprehensive curriculum with modern technology
  • +Dedicated and supportive faculty
  • +Rich academic and cultural activities
  • +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
  • +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
  • +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Affordable education and accessible quality academics
  • +Diverse programs available
  • +Strong medical school program
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.

Nothing to show

  • -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a major concern.
  • -The curriculum is seen as irrelevant and not preparing students for the future.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Poor communication and administrative support.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Ineffective communication and administrative inefficiencies.
  • -Lack of academic support and engagement from instructors.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly excelling in its **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a perfect 5. Facilities, Professors, Accommodations, and Value are also highly rated, each earning a solid 4. While no areas fall below a strong standing, these latter categories represent the relative weakest points in its otherwise outstanding profile.

Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and receives a perfect score for them. Professors are rated highly, though not as outstanding as other areas. The university's weakest point is its internationality, indicated by a moderate score. Overall, it presents a very positive environment for students, with value for money also being a strong suit.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

These reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 100% of feedback rating the university 4-5 stars. Students highlight excellent technology, a relevant curriculum, dedicated teachers, and strong engineering programs as key strengths.

All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Based on one review, this university is praised for affordable and accessible education with diverse programs, particularly its Medical school. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% indicating a good experience.

Rating distribution
5★
67%
0%
100%
63%
0%
50%
0%
4★
39%
0%
0%
38%
0%
0%
100%
3★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close