London School of Commerce - LSC vs RV University vs Mount Carmel College - MCC vs Ramaiah College of Law vs The Oxford College of Pharmacy

Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Ramaiah College of Law (4.70)
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/5 categories
RV University: wins 0/5 categories
Mount Carmel College - MCC: wins 0/5 categories
Ramaiah College of Law: wins 5/5 categories
The Oxford College of Pharmacy: wins 0/5 categories
Bangalore University: wins 0/5 categories
Bangalore Technological Institute: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Bangalore, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Arts in Sociology
Bangalore, India
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration and Bachelor of Legislative Law
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Bangalore, India
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: International Hotel Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
3.44
4.33
Win
4.25
2.50
Not rated
Location
4.75
Not rated
4.67
4.67
4.75
3.50
Not rated
Professors
3.25
Not rated
3.89
5.00
Win
3.50
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
3.89
4.00
4.00
2.50
Not rated
Student life
3.75
Not rated
4.22
4.33
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Value
2.75
Not rated
3.89
4.33
Win
4.00
2.50
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
3.89
4.67
Win
4.00
1.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and friendly faculty and staff
  • +Diverse subject combinations and exploration opportunities
  • +Vibrant campus life and strong student community
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Excellent professional development opportunities
  • +Broadening of opportunities and challenging activities
  • +Excellent academic performance and teaching support
  • +Strong sense of community and excellent resources
  • +High-quality infrastructure and facilities
  • +Top-notch education and academic quality
  • +Strong reputation and recognition

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt learning and create frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of effective communication and transparency from the institution is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality are inconsistent, with many finding it irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is frustrating.
  • -Disappointing course structure with excessive theory and insufficient practical experience.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

Analysis of university ratings reveals strengths in its **Location**, which received the highest score, and a notably positive reception for **Student Life**. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring lower than other surveyed aspects. Other categories like Professors, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value all garnered strong, consistent ratings.

A generally positive university profile is evident, with professors receiving the highest possible rating of 5. Location and accommodation also score strongly. Areas with slightly lower, though still good, scores include internationality. Facilities, student life, and value are all rated consistently well, indicating a solid all-around experience.

This university demonstrates a strong profile, particularly excelling in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** all received solid marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The area with the lowest rating is **Professors**, suggesting a potential point for improvement.

This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across key areas. Location and student life stand out positively, achieving moderate scores. However, accommodation is a significant weakness, receiving a very low rating. Facilities, professors, internationality, and overall value also fall into the lower-mid range, suggesting areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise academic excellence, friendly faculty, and a beautiful campus. Some note minor drawbacks like lack of lifts.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with students praising the supportive environment, helpful faculty, and exceptional opportunities for professional and personal development.

With an average rating of 3.75/5, approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting great performance, a strong tutorial system, and good infrastructure. Some minor concerns were noted regarding student behavior and workload.

University reviews are split, with one positive and one negative, averaging 3/5 stars. Approximately 50% of feedback is negative, citing poor course structure and lack of practical exposure in specific subjects.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
33%
67%
0%
50%
0%
4★
25%
0%
33%
33%
75%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
33%
0%
25%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close