Budapest Business University - BBU vs Eötvös Loránd University - ELTE vs ESSCA School of Management vs Kodolányi János University - KJU vs Wekerle International University

Side-by-side comparison from 84 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Eötvös Loránd University - ELTE (4.10)
Budapest Business University - BBU: wins 0/7 categories
Eötvös Loránd University - ELTE: wins 3/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 2/7 categories
Kodolányi János University - KJU: wins 0/7 categories
Wekerle International University: wins 2/7 categories
Edutus University: wins 0/7 categories
Avicenna International College: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Tourism and Catering
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: MBA
Budapest, Hungary
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.79
3.71
3.84
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.05
4.62
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.89
4.10
Win
3.95
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.95
4.17
Win
3.79
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.63
3.79
4.28
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.89
4.12
Win
3.74
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.37
3.23
3.42
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical knowledge and real-world application
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Strong student support and well-structured courses
  • +Excellent professors and clear explanations
  • +Rigorous and well-structured programs
  • +Broad and interesting study options
  • +Supportive and practical learning environment
  • +Vibrant student life and activities
  • +International and diverse community

Nothing to show

  • +Friendly, international learning environment
  • +Supportive professors, practical business concepts
  • +Organized classes, useful study materials

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Unprofessional teaching staff and language barriers.
  • -Disorganized structure and struggles with course registration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
  • -Poor professor preparedness and teaching quality
  • -Irrelevant and expensive courses
  • -Disorganized administration

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university garners a strong overall rating, with Location emerging as its most celebrated aspect. Professors and Value are also highly regarded. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Student Life and Facilities are mid-range, while Internationality is also a notable strength. The university presents a generally positive picture, with distinct areas of excellence and areas for potential improvement.

Regarding university ratings, the strongest area is undeniably Location, scoring a remarkable 4.62. Internationality and Value also received high marks, both exceeding 4.1. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.23. Facilities and Student Life received moderate scores around 3.7, while Professors were rated positively at approximately 4.1.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its Location and Student Life, both receiving high marks. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Other surveyed categories, including Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value, fall within a moderate range, indicating generally satisfactory performance.

Nothing to show

Overall, this institution demonstrates a solid performance across multiple facets of student experience. Its location receives the highest mark, a testament to its desirable setting. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, suggesting potential room for improvement in this regard. Other aspects like facilities, professors, student life, internationality, and value are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded educational environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical knowledge and professional, up-to-date teachers. ~9.5% of feedback indicates issues with communication and organization.

With an average rating of 4.09/5 from 43 reviews, ~74% are positive. Students praise rigorous and well-structured programs with knowledgeable professors and a broad curriculum. Some mention administrative disorganization and language barriers with certain staff.

With an average rating of 3.89, roughly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful staff, enjoyable campus life, and practical learning. A small percentage of feedback noted unprepared professors and irrelevant coursework.

Nothing to show

With one review available, the university has a 4/5 average rating. The feedback highlights a friendly, international environment and supportive professors. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
29%
35%
32%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
29%
40%
42%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
33%
26%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
5%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
5%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Dynamic environment and teachers

The environment is good and it’s multicultural The compound is really nice but a bit far(depending on the faculty) They should have a sports team because of the facilities that they have They should really consider the sports career of the university

Mixed feelings

There is a big variety of departments to choose from, including ones that are the only available ones within the country. Unfortunately on the other hand, the organization and communication of the institution was not on the level of quality that one would expect from one of the top universities in the country. Regarding the quality of education, I had very mixed experiences as there are big differences within the departments and among the professors.

Well-rounded programme

Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close