Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa - UNSA vs Universidad Católica de Santa María - UCSM vs University of Kentucky vs Universidad Católica San Pablo - UCSP vs Ramgarhia Institute of Engineering and Technology
Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +University offers personal growth and opportunity discernment.
- +Free tuition and a sense of belonging are appreciated.
Nothing to show
- +Welcoming community & diverse programs
- +Helpful professors & good facilities
- +Career opportunities & campus involvement
Nothing to show
- +Affordable tuition and accessible programs
- +Diverse and multicultural student body
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Disciplined, healthy academic environment with helpful teachers
- +Friendly atmosphere and engaging co-curricular activities
- +Prestigious institution with academic excellence and opportunities
- +Practical, real-world applications and project-based learning
- +Balanced theory and lab work focus
- +Strong curriculum in core engineering areas
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -The curriculum often feels irrelevant, unengaging, or poorly structured.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
- -Disorganized administration and ineffective management cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of essential resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of student support and engagement from staff is a consistent complaint.
This institution presents a well-rounded profile, with particularly strong ratings in **Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation**, all receiving a score of 4 out of 5. The university also scores well on **Value**. In contrast, **Internationality** is its weakest area with a rating of 3, while **Professors** received a solid 3.5.
Nothing to show
Overall, this institution garners very positive feedback from students. It shines brightest in Student Life and Internationality, both scoring an impressive 4.8. Facilities also receive excellent marks at 4.75. The area with the comparatively lowest rating is Professors, though still strong at 4.4.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in areas such as **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. The **Value** offered also stands out, earning a top rating. Conversely, its **Internationality** is a significant weakness, scoring only a single point. Ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accomodation** are moderate, all receiving a score of three.
With notable strengths in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, scoring a high 4.5 in both, this university offers an excellent environment for practical learning and social engagement. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker point, receiving a score of 2. The university also shows a moderate performance in **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all rated at 3.5, while **Location** scored a lower 2.5.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded. While the location garners a strong rating, the professorial quality is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Overall, the university offers a commendable experience with particularly excellent offerings in its social and living environments.
Two out of three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 3.67/5. Students highlight opportunities for personal growth and value the university's legacy, though one notes a decline in academic standards.
Nothing to show
With a 4.4/5 average rating from five reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent facilities, professors, and diverse opportunities, while a small portion notes occasional administrative issues.
Nothing to show
The single review is highly positive, rating the university 5/5. It praises affordable prices and access to sought-after programs like Civil Engineering. Positive aspects also include a multicultural environment, approachable professors, and convenient city-center location.
With an average rating of 4/5, university student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise the healthy academic environment, helpful teachers, and organized campus. Minor academic pressure during exams was noted.
With a single review, the average rating is 4/5. This feedback highlights a solid and practical MSc in Electrical Engineering, emphasizing real-world applications, balanced theory and lab work, and project-based learning.
San Agustín de Arequipa University is the most important university in Arequipa city. The reason? A lot of famous people were in that house of studies. Personally, I think that nowadays the university keeps their essence but not the academic level to the modern world. Anyway, studying there is free and is not bad to start! I feel agustina!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show