United States International University Africa - USIU vs Africa International University - AIU vs Railways Training Institute - RTI vs Kenya Institute of Mass Communication - KIMC vs University of Nairobi

Side-by-side comparison from 62 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Africa International University - AIU (5.00)
United States International University Africa - USIU: wins 2/6 categories
Africa International University - AIU: wins 3/6 categories
Railways Training Institute - RTI: wins 0/6 categories
Kenya Institute of Mass Communication - KIMC: wins 0/6 categories
University of Nairobi: wins 1/6 categories
Kenya Medical Training College: wins 0/6 categories
Amref International University - AMIU: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Journalism
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Architectural Engineering
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Best programme: Economic and Social Sciences
Best programme: Environmental Sciences
Best programme: Community Health and Epidemiology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.71
Win
3.00
4.00
4.00
3.25
3.75
4.00
Location
4.43
5.00
4.67
5.00
4.25
4.00
4.00
Professors
4.50
4.50
4.33
4.00
4.75
Win
4.00
4.00
Internationality
4.72
5.00
Win
3.67
4.00
4.25
3.00
4.00
Student life
4.72
Win
4.50
4.33
3.00
3.50
2.75
4.00
Value
4.54
5.00
Win
4.00
4.50
4.50
4.25
4.00
Accommodation
4.33
4.50
Win
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.25
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, real-world learning experiences
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Diverse and enriching student community
  • +Flexible and adaptable virtual learning options
  • +International reach and diverse student/lecturer base
  • +Commitment to inclusivity through scholarships
  • +Practical, engaging learning with immediately applicable skills.
  • +Unique, specialized programs in niche fields.
  • +Quality campus facilities and resources.
  • +Practical skills development for career readiness
  • +Personal and talent growth opportunities
  • +Engaging, practical learning with supportive professors
  • +Positive study environment and networking opportunities
  • +Real-world exposure and career shaping
  • +Dedicated and committed lecturers
  • +Clear learning objectives and practical skill development
  • +Slow administrative processes
  • +Inclusivity and health focus
  • +Skill development for decision-making
  • +Lasting opportunities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of transparency exacerbate existing problems.
  • -Excessive and unclear administrative policies cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -A lack of adequate support and resources hinders student success.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in curriculum is disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from staff are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment
  • -Lack of support and resources
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners impressive scores across various aspects, with Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality all achieving near-perfect ratings of 4.7. Professors and Value also stand out with scores above 4.5. The weakest area, though still solid, is Accomodation, with a rating of 4.33.

This institution presents a compelling profile, excelling in its prime location, vibrant student life, excellent accommodation options, strong international presence, and exceptional value, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its facilities represent the sole area for improvement, scoring a respectable but comparatively lower three. Professors are also highly regarded, earning a near-perfect 4.5.

The institution receives very positive evaluations, with its location standing out as the strongest area. Professors and student life also earned high marks. Areas for improvement include internationality, which received the lowest score. Facilities, accommodation, and value were rated solidly in the middle.

This university garners excellent scores for its location, achieving a perfect 5. Its facilities and professors also stand out with strong 4-star ratings, complemented by a solid 4.5 for value. Areas for development include student life and accommodation, both scoring a respectable 3 to 3.5 stars. Internationality also received a positive 4-star rating.

Across surveyed categories, this institution garners an exceptional 4.75 for its professors, its strongest attribute. The university also scores highly in location and internationality, both at 4.25, and boasts strong value at 4.5. Conversely, facilities at 3.25 and student life at 3.5 represent the weakest aspects of the student experience, while accommodation sits at a moderate 3.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas, with **Value** and **Location** receiving the highest scores at 4.25 and 4 respectively. Professors are also well-regarded, averaging a 4. While facilities and internationality are rated moderately, student life and accommodation represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 2.75 and 2.25, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This university garners consistently high marks across all assessed aspects. Its strengths are evident in uniformly excellent ratings for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all scoring a solid 4 out of 5. No single area stands out as significantly weaker than the others, suggesting a well-rounded and satisfactory experience for students in every key domain.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all (nearly 100%) of 46 reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, practical learning, and a supportive environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

Both reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight the university's swift adaptability, particularly its successful transition to virtual studies during COVID-19, and its inclusive scholarship opportunities. The e-learning system is praised for its global reach and powerful teaching methods.

All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight practical modules, engaging lecturers, and valuable skills gained from their learning experiences. The university's unique rail and road courses and central Nairobi location were also appreciated.

With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, students highlight strong practical skill development and opportunities to foster personal talents. No negative comments were received.

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students appreciate the learning environment, interactive and practical lessons, and supportive lecturer-student relationships. System delays are a minor, infrequently mentioned issue.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 4 reviews, ~75% are positive. Students praise opportunities for growth, skill development, and committed lecturers. Some noted slow registration processes and poor food quality, with limited options.

With a 4/5 average rating, this university has received overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight opportunities for growth and skill development, particularly in healthcare decision-making, and praise initiatives for inclusivity and health in Africa. No negative feedback was reported.

Rating distribution
5★
61%
100%
67%
0%
25%
25%
0%
4★
37%
0%
33%
100%
75%
50%
100%
3★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
USIU TIMES

If I had to rate USIU I would rate it 8/10. my experience so far has been good overall. What I enjoy most is the classroom interactions with the class and the lecturer. I also like the diversity of religions, cultures, and overall personalities. Some of my dislikes are they don't have a vast variety of food at the University. I would gladly recommend it.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close