Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs Yarsi University vs Jakarta State Polytechnic vs Jayabaya University vs Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Gayus Lumbuun

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Jayabaya University (5.00)
Bina Nusantara University - UBN: wins 0/4 categories
Yarsi University: wins 4/4 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/4 categories
Jayabaya University: wins 0/4 categories
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Gayus Lumbuun: wins 0/4 categories
Universitas Nasional - UNAS: wins 0/4 categories
University of Bunda Mulia - UBM: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.15
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.64
5.00
3.50
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.71
5.00
Win
2.50
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.21
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.57
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.38
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
  • +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection
  • +Cleanliness and modern facilities
  • +Kind, friendly staff and lecturers
  • +Integrated technology like CCTV and Wi-Fi
  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities
  • +Practical application and project engagement
  • +Comprehensive curriculum coverage

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources impede learning and comfort.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching effectiveness are a common complaint.
  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
  • -Inconsistent and poor communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support for academic and personal needs.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.

This institution receives perfect scores across the board, indicating outstanding performance in all evaluated areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are all rated at the highest possible level, presenting a uniformly excellent experience for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings.

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

The university garners exceptionally strong scores in several key areas, with perfect ratings awarded for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life. Location and Accommodation are also positively rated at a 4 out of 5. Its weakest area appears to be Internationality, scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a strong emphasis on the student experience and academic quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, Yarsi University is positively perceived as a good Muslim campus. The single review highlights cleanliness and modern facilities. Negative feedback is negligible.

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

This single review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights Jayabaya's programs effectively combining theory with practical application, through projects and case studies.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
64%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
36%
100%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close