Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University - ULSPU vs Buckinghamshire New University - Bucks New Uni vs Flensburg University of Applied Sciences vs Jacksonville University vs Achievers University - AUO

Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University - ULSPU (4.50)
Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University - ULSPU: wins 0/7 categories
Buckinghamshire New University - Bucks New Uni: wins 4/7 categories
Flensburg University of Applied Sciences: wins 2/7 categories
Jacksonville University: wins 0/7 categories
Achievers University - AUO: wins 0/7 categories
Nguyen Tat Thanh University: wins 0/7 categories
Bangladesh Dental College: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Buckinghamshire, The United Kingdom
4.00
Read more reviews
19 reviews
×
Best programme: Nursing
Best programme: Wind Energy
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Biomedical Engineering
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.11
Win
4.00
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
2.00
Location
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
Not rated
4.61
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
2.00
Internationality
Not rated
4.17
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
2.00
Student life
Not rated
4.24
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
3.00
Value
Not rated
4.11
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
1.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.82
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong student support and career assistance
  • +Active campus life and creative opportunities
  • +Supportive and accessible staff
  • +Engaging and challenging academic programs
  • +Positive learning environment and community
  • +Helpful and updated instructors.
  • +Relevant curriculum meeting market needs.
  • +Positive university experience.

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging academics with close lecturer-student interaction
  • +Safe environment with extracurricular opportunities
  • +Strong emphasis on discipline and character development

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities & equipment
  • -Inconsistent and uninspiring teaching quality
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and irrelevant curriculum content are disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent concerns.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

A consistent rating of zero across all surveyed categories presents a peculiar academic profile. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or identifiable weaknesses to highlight. The university performs uniformly poorly in every aspect, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, according to the provided metrics.

Professors at this institution are exceptionally well-regarded, earning a high rating. Student life and internationality also received positive scores, reflecting well on these aspects. While generally favorable, accommodation stands out as the area with the lowest rating. Facilities and value for money are also rated competently.

Overall, this institution receives consistently strong ratings across various aspects. Its professors are a standout strength, achieving a perfect score. Areas like facilities, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated highly at a 4. This indicates a well-rounded and appealing university experience, with teaching quality being its most prominent asset.

Nothing to show

This university's value for money is a standout strength, earning a perfect 4. Internationality and student life also received positive marks, both above 3.5. Conversely, the facilities are a clear area for improvement, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors and accommodation are rated moderately.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All four reviews are positive, giving an average of 4.5/5 stars. Students praise the quality of education and professors, while also mentioning good employment support and developed public activities.

Approximately 100% of reviews are positive, with students highlighting friendly, supportive staff and engaging academic experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a single review and an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. This student found the university to be a good experience, highlighting helpful doctors and up-to-date market relevance.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.67/5 from 3 reviews, ~67% are positive. Students highlight growth, academic improvement, and a great learning experience with engaging lecturers and opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
79%
100%
0%
67%
0%
0%
3★
0%
11%
0%
0%
33%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close