Durban University of Technology - DUT vs Milpark Education vs IMM Graduate School vs MANCOSA - MANCOSA vs Inscape Education Group

Side-by-side comparison from 62 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Durban University of Technology - DUT: wins 0/3 categories
Milpark Education: wins 0/3 categories
IMM Graduate School: wins 1/3 categories
MANCOSA - MANCOSA: wins 0/3 categories
Inscape Education Group: wins 0/3 categories
REGENT Business School - RBS: wins 2/3 categories
AFDA - AFDA: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Cape Town, South Africa
2.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Durban, South Africa
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Marketing
Durban, South Africa
4.60
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Financial Management
Durban, South Africa
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Fashion Design
Best programme: Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Durban, South Africa
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Film and Television Producing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.24
1.25
5.00
4.11
3.00
5.00
4.00
Location
4.26
3.00
4.00
4.30
3.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Professors
4.31
3.00
4.00
4.09
5.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
3.83
3.00
4.50
4.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Student life
4.28
1.25
4.00
4.20
3.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Value
4.24
3.00
5.00
4.64
5.00
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
4.27
1.00
4.50
Win
3.17
1.00
Not rated
1.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive, dedicated, and knowledgeable lecturers.
  • +Engaging, relevant coursework and practical learning.
  • +Positive campus environment with strong friendships.
  • +Exceptional flexibility for working professionals.
  • +Strong lecturer availability and support systems.
  • +Well-structured and engaging course content.
  • +Experienced and qualified tutors
  • +Flexible study options allowing work-life balance
  • +Relevant and competitive course modules
  • +Flexible online programs balancing work and study
  • +Supportive lecturers and practical learning experiences
  • +Efficient registration and accessible study resources
  • +Passionate yet relaxed study environment
  • +Fun, hardworking lectures
  • +Well-organized, friendly, and chilled atmosphere
  • +Supportive lecturers & practical content
  • +Flexible online platform & diverse environment
  • +Value & solid learning experience
  • +Practical, hands-on industry preparation
  • +Development of transferrable skills
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of support and perceived discrimination.
  • -Insufficient practical experience and career assistance for students.
  • -Administrative and communication issues create confusion and unnecessary costs.
  • -The institution prioritizes financial gain over genuine student support and well-being.
  • -Exam content and assessment procedures are misleading and unfair.
  • -Poor communication and administrative problems are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a consistent complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or not well-suited to industry needs.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of support.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and equipment.
  • -Limited access to essential resources and learning materials.
  • -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a major concern.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not preparing them for the future.
  • -Disorganized administration and poor communication.
  • -Uninspiring and outdated facilities.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and unengaging curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives excellent marks across most aspects. Professors and Student Life are particularly strong, both scoring above 4.3. Facilities, Location, and Accommodation also show robust approval. The sole area showing a notably lower rating is Internationality, which stands at 3.83. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded positive student experience, with value also remaining strong at over 4.2.

This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its evaluated aspects. Its weakest areas, with scores of 1.25 and 1 respectively, are Facilities and Accomodation, suggesting significant room for improvement in these domains. Conversely, Location, Internationality, and Value are its strongest points, all receiving a solid rating of 3. Professors also perform moderately well at 3.

This institution garners exceptional ratings, particularly excelling in its facilities and overall value, both receiving a perfect score. Student life, location, accommodation, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring 4 or 4.5 out of 5. The professors are the lowest-rated area, though still solid with a 4, indicating a generally positive and well-rounded university experience.

This institution receives high marks in several key areas, notably excelling in **Value (4.64)** and **Location (4.3)**. **Student Life (4.2)** and **Facilities (4.11)** are also rated positively. However, **Accomodation (3.17)** stands out as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in student living arrangements. Other categories like Professors and Internationality also received solid, above average scores.

Offering exceptional strengths, this institution shines in its **professors, internationality, and value**, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, **accommodation presents a significant weakness** with a low rating of 1. Facilities, student life, and location are rated moderately, suggesting areas for potential improvement in these aspects to complement its already outstanding core offerings.

An outstanding evaluation showcases top marks in facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value, all receiving perfect scores. However, a significant area for improvement is accommodation, which received a score of zero. This indicates a need for considerable development in housing options to match the university's strengths in other aspects.

Exceptional marks were awarded for professors, internationality, and value, indicating these are significant strengths. Conversely, accommodation received a considerably lower score, highlighting it as a clear area for improvement. Ratings for facilities, location, and student life were positive and consistent, suggesting a generally good, though not outstanding, experience in these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting supportive teachers, good learning environments, and strong academic experiences. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with racism and a lack of practical application or career assistance.

Half of the university's reviews are negative, citing communication and application issues, as well as concerns about finances and perceived unfair grading. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and lecturer support, despite the high cost.

With a 5/5 average rating from two reviews, students praise the university for qualified tutors and flexible study options that allow balancing life and work. There is no negative feedback.

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praised flexible online programs, responsiveness, and practical course content preparation for the workforce.

The sole review is highly positive, rating the university 5/5. It praises a passionate yet relaxed study environment, well-organized and friendly atmosphere, and engaging lectures suitable for creative students. This indicates approximately 100% positive feedback.

With one review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. The student praised flexibility, supportive lecturers, and practical content. No negative feedback was received.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, rating the institution a perfect 5/5. This feedback highlights excellent industry preparation, hands-on experience, and the development of transferable skills.

Rating distribution
5★
57%
25%
100%
64%
100%
100%
100%
4★
33%
25%
0%
36%
0%
0%
0%
3★
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Very good

The university is very good and has good education, I enjoyed being there because even the environment is very good ,you just feel welcome. The level of education is very high meaning lecturers know they job in terms of educating

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close