Durban University of Technology - DUT vs Milpark Education vs IMM Graduate School vs Thekwini College vs MANCOSA - MANCOSA
Side-by-side comparison from 62 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and dedicated faculty
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong sense of community and belonging
- +Exceptional flexibility for working professionals.
- +Strong lecturer availability and support systems.
- +Well-structured and engaging course content.
- +Experienced and qualified tutors
- +Flexible study options allowing work-life balance
- +Relevant and competitive course modules
Nothing to show
- +Flexible online programs balancing work and study
- +Supportive lecturers and practical learning experiences
- +Efficient registration and accessible study resources
- +Supportive lecturers & practical content
- +Flexible online platform & diverse environment
- +Value & solid learning experience
- +Practical, hands-on industry preparation
- +Development of transferrable skills
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Discrimination against students, particularly Black students, is a significant concern.
- -Lack of practical experience and employment assistance is disappointing.
- -Administrative and communication issues create confusion and unnecessary costs.
- -The institution prioritizes financial gain over genuine student support and well-being.
- -Exam content and assessment procedures are misleading and unfair.
- -Poor communication and administrative problems are frequent frustrations.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a consistent complaint.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or not well-suited to industry needs.
Nothing to show
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of support.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and equipment.
- -Limited access to essential resources and learning materials.
- -Disorganized administration and poor communication.
- -Uninspiring and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of effective teaching and unengaging curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback across most aspects. Its professors and student life are particularly well-regarded, receiving high scores. Facilities and accommodation also present strengths, closely mirroring professor ratings. The weakest area appears to be internationality, which significantly lags behind other categories. Value and location are also strong, though not reaching the absolute highest marks.
This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its evaluated aspects. Its weakest areas, with scores of 1.25 and 1 respectively, are Facilities and Accomodation, suggesting significant room for improvement in these domains. Conversely, Location, Internationality, and Value are its strongest points, all receiving a solid rating of 3. Professors also perform moderately well at 3.
This institution garners exceptional ratings, particularly excelling in its facilities and overall value, both receiving a perfect score. Student life, location, accommodation, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring 4 or 4.5 out of 5. The professors are the lowest-rated area, though still solid with a 4, indicating a generally positive and well-rounded university experience.
Nothing to show
This institution receives high marks in several key areas, notably excelling in **Value (4.64)** and **Location (4.3)**. **Student Life (4.2)** and **Facilities (4.11)** are also rated positively. However, **Accomodation (3.17)** stands out as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in student living arrangements. Other categories like Professors and Internationality also received solid, above average scores.
An outstanding evaluation showcases top marks in facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value, all receiving perfect scores. However, a significant area for improvement is accommodation, which received a score of zero. This indicates a need for considerable development in housing options to match the university's strengths in other aspects.
Exceptional marks were awarded for professors, internationality, and value, indicating these are significant strengths. Conversely, accommodation received a considerably lower score, highlighting it as a clear area for improvement. Ratings for facilities, location, and student life were positive and consistent, suggesting a generally good, though not outstanding, experience in these aspects.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93%), highlighting supportive teachers and good academic experiences. A small percentage (~7%) mention issues with specific programs or administrative support.
Half of the university's reviews are negative, citing communication and application issues, as well as concerns about finances and perceived unfair grading. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and lecturer support, despite the high cost.
With a 5/5 average rating from two reviews, students praise the university for qualified tutors and flexible study options that allow balancing life and work. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praised flexible online programs, responsiveness, and practical course content preparation for the workforce.
With one review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. The student praised flexibility, supportive lecturers, and practical content. No negative feedback was received.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, rating the institution a perfect 5/5. This feedback highlights excellent industry preparation, hands-on experience, and the development of transferable skills.
The university is very good and has good education, I enjoyed being there because even the environment is very good ,you just feel welcome. The level of education is very high meaning lecturers know they job in terms of educating
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show