Norwich University of the Arts - NUA vs Rose Bruford College of Theatre & Performance - RBC vs Andalas University vs Serang Raya University - UNSERA vs University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Side-by-side comparison from 4 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Norwich University of the Arts - NUA: wins 0/1 categories
Rose Bruford College of Theatre & Performance - RBC: wins 0/1 categories
Andalas University: wins 1/1 categories
Serang Raya University - UNSERA: wins 0/1 categories
University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa: wins 0/1 categories
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering - Inelec: wins 0/1 categories
Kunsan National University: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Norwich, The United Kingdom
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Fine Arts
Best programme: European Theatre Arts
padang, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Civil and Environmental Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
3.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Location
5.00
2.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.00
3.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Value
2.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Limited information, but if more reviews were provided, I could identify common appreciation themes.
  • +Inclusive environment and supportive tutors
  • +Abundant on-campus facilities and performance opportunities
  • +Diverse community with offerings
  • +Beautiful campus scenery
  • +Renowned professors
  • +Rich history and tradition

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive professors and excellent research facilities
  • +Diverse extracurricular and cultural activities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Unclear communication and inconsistent support from staff are problematic.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are a frequent complaint.
  • -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and lacking in practical application.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of adequate support and communication from staff is a persistent problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in **Location**, receiving a perfect score, and also garners strong marks for **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**. Conversely, **Value** stands out as its weakest area, scoring a 2. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately. Overall, the university offers a very appealing environment for students, though prospective students might want to carefully consider the perceived value.

This institution excels in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for Professors and Internationality. However, its Location received the lowest rating, indicating a potential drawback for some prospective students. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value are rated moderately, while Accomodation stands out as a strong positive.

This institution garners perfect scores in all assessed aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality all received a top rating of 5 out of 5. Furthermore, students perceive the university as offering excellent value for their investment, also achieving a score of 5. The university demonstrates no discernible weaknesses across these metrics, presenting a consistently outstanding profile.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Overall, this institution garners very positive feedback. It excels particularly in its **facilities, professors, student life, and accommodation**, all receiving perfect scores. The university also scores well in **internationality and value**. Its **location** is the sole area that received a slightly lower, though still strong, rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, this university has an average rating of 4 out of 5 stars. The feedback was entirely positive, indicating no negative experiences were reported.

With a single review, the university is rated 4/5. The feedback highlights inclusive environments, supportive tutors, and good on-campus facilities. Limited nightlife is a minor drawback.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive, highlighting beautiful campus views and renowned professors. This single review praises the university's aesthetic appeal and academic reputation.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review is positive, rating the university 5/5. This reviewer highlighted supportive professors and excellent research facilities as key strengths, along with diverse extracurricular activities. There are no negative reviews.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close