Polish Japanese Academy of Information Technology - PJATK vs Adeyemi College of Education vs Olusegun Agagu University of Science and Technology - OAUSTECH vs Northern Quezon College Incorporated vs Elizade University

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Northern Quezon College Incorporated (5.00)
Polish Japanese Academy of Information Technology - PJATK: wins 0/6 categories
Adeyemi College of Education: wins 0/6 categories
Olusegun Agagu University of Science and Technology - OAUSTECH : wins 0/6 categories
Northern Quezon College Incorporated: wins 6/6 categories
Elizade University: wins 0/6 categories
Ondo State University of Medical Sciences: wins 0/6 categories
Adeyemi Federal University of Education - AFUED: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Information Management
Best programme: Biology
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
3.25
3.80
5.00
4.00
Not rated
2.33
Location
4.67
3.00
2.83
5.00
Win
1.50
Not rated
3.00
Professors
4.33
3.25
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Internationality
4.00
3.50
3.00
5.00
Win
1.50
Not rated
3.67
Student life
4.00
3.75
3.17
5.00
Win
1.50
Not rated
3.67
Value
4.67
3.75
4.17
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
3.67
3.25
3.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical and industry-focused programs
  • +Supportive and engaging learning environment
  • +Excellent and dedicated faculty
  • +Strong academic foundation and relevant curriculum
  • +Passionate and helpful lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment and active campus life
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable, supportive lecturers.
  • +Positive campus life and community atmosphere.
  • +Focus on science and technology with practical learning opportunities.
  • +strong academic & business programs
  • +diverse course offerings
  • +recognition by the commission
  • +High-quality education and course accreditation
  • +Poor student affairs and lack of student union

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated lecturers with high academic standards
  • +Positive learning environment and enjoyable program experience
  • +Well-structured study patterns and courses
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are commonly criticized.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a consistent complaint.
  • -Lack of instructor support and unclear course expectations are frequently mentioned.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a major concern.
  • -Poor communication and support lead to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources impede learning.
  • -Communication from faculty and the institution is often poor and unclear.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Limited career services and support for future employment are disappointing.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a common complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates significant strengths in its **Facilities**, which received a perfect score, and its **Location** and **Value**, both rated highly. The university also received a solid 4.33 for its **Professors**. Its **Accommodations** are a weaker area, scoring 3.67, while **Student Life** and **Internationality** received satisfactory marks at 4.

Overall, this institution presents a well-rounded academic environment. Student life and value for money stand out as its strongest attributes, both scoring 3.75. On the other hand, location is the weakest point, rated at 3. Facilities, professors, and accommodation are all rated consistently at 3.25, while internationality scores a respectable 3.5.

This institution shows a strong performance in terms of **Value**, receiving a high rating of 4.17. Professors are also highly regarded at 4. The university's **Location**, however, stands out as its weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.83. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality fall within a moderate range.

This institution achieves perfect scores across the board, indicating a uniformly excellent experience. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodation, received a full five stars. The university also excels in its location and internationality, and students perceive it as offering exceptional value. No discernible weak areas emerged from this comprehensive rating.

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its facilities, professor quality, accommodation options, and overall value, all receiving a strong rating of 4. However, the university's weakest areas lie in its location, student life, and internationality, with each scoring a low 1.5. These contrasting scores suggest a significant disparity between academic and infrastructural strengths and external or community-focused aspects.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates a distinct divide in its strengths and weaknesses. Its strongest areas are undoubtedly **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving a high rating of 4.33. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest aspect, scoring a considerably lower 2.33. Other aspects like **Location** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately at 3, while **Student Life** and **Internationality** fall in the middle range.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5 stars. Students highlight great teachers, strong industry connections, and a blend of theory and practice, particularly in computer science and multimedia.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 4 reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight strong academic foundations, passionate teaching, and positive campus life. No negative reviews were submitted.

All 6 reviews are positive, averaging 4.33/5 stars. Students highlight strong academics and dedicated lecturers, with some noting limited campus life and a need for facility upgrades.

The single review for Northern Quezon College Incorporated is overwhelmingly positive, rating it 5/5. This suggests a highly satisfactory student experience with no negative feedback.

With an average rating of 3.5/5 and ~0% negative feedback, reviews highlight good education and accreditation. However, one review noted poor student affairs and lack of a student union.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students praise committed lecturers and a learning environment that fosters discipline and a strong work ethic. Some experienced mixed feelings due to minor stressful periods or perceived unnecessary taxing.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
50%
33%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
50%
67%
0%
50%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

The Teaching Pace

Asides the usual strike that disturbs students…I think my years in school was the absolute best. I had someone that walked up to me and said that a second-class student in my school would definitely be a first class student elsewhere because of how we were taught.

Great learning Environment

Olusegun Agagu University of Science and Technology (OAUSTECH) has a strong academic focus on science and technology, which I fell in love with. The lecturers are so knowledgeable with top academic qualifications, and valuable research opportunities. However, I believe the university could improve in campus facilities, which I belief do not meet the needs of the growing student body. While the infrastructure has improved, more attention is needed for student housing and support services. I strongly recommend my school

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A Strong Foundation for Future Educators.

Adeyemi Federal University of Education is a great institution for anyone passionate about becoming an educator. The lecturers are committed to academic excellence and maintain high standards when it comes to lectures, assignments, and deadlines. The learning environment encourages discipline, responsibility, and a strong work ethic, all of which prepare students well for the teaching profession. One area where I believe the university can improve is in exposing students to more opportunities beyond the classroom. Greater collaboration with industries, international organisations, mentorship programmes, and career development initiatives would better prepare students for today's competitive world. I also believe the institution should invest more in technology and digital learning to equip students with relevant 21st-century skills. Overall, I would recommend the university to prospective students, especially those pursuing a career in education. It provides a solid academic foundation, and with increased investment in technology and student development opportunities, it has the potential to become an even stronger institution.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close