Duke University - DU vs Joaquim Chissano University - UJC vs Eduardo Mondlane University - UEM vs Zaporizhzhia National University vs Universidade São Tomás

Side-by-side comparison from 55 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Duke University - DU (4.20)
Duke University - DU: wins 2/6 categories
Joaquim Chissano University - UJC: wins 0/6 categories
Eduardo Mondlane University - UEM: wins 0/6 categories
Zaporizhzhia National University: wins 1/6 categories
Universidade São Tomás: wins 1/6 categories
Polytechnic University Maputo - apolitécnica: wins 0/6 categories
Pukyong National University: wins 2/6 categories
Comparing
Durham, North Carolina, United States
4.20
Top
Read more reviews
46 reviews
×
Best programme: Finance
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Best programme: Business
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
Not rated
3.20
3.00
3.00
2.00
5.00
Win
Location
4.34
Not rated
3.25
3.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.34
Win
Not rated
4.20
3.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
Internationality
4.20
Win
Not rated
4.20
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
Student life
4.33
Not rated
3.40
5.00
Win
3.00
2.00
4.00
Value
4.27
Not rated
4.60
3.00
5.00
2.00
5.00
Accommodation
4.26
Not rated
3.00
3.00
3.00
2.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and inclusive community
  • +Rigorous academics and faculty support
  • +Balanced campus life and extracurriculars

Nothing to show

  • +High academic quality and qualified professors
  • +Free tuition and accessible entry
  • +Good reputation and campus environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Student opportunities and helpfulness
  • +Specialization in fisheries studies
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance plague the campus.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a significant problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative and communication problems.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
  • -Insufficient resources and support for students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and a disconnect from practical applications are major drawbacks.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university receives strong ratings across key areas. Professors and location are particularly well-regarded, both scoring 4.34. Student life also performs well at 4.33. Facilities, accommodation, and value are rated solidly in the 4.2 to 4.3 range. The weakest area, while still good, is internationality at 4.20.

Nothing to show

Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The highest marks were achieved in **Value** (4.6) and **Professors** and **Internationality** (both 4.2), indicating significant strengths in these areas. Conversely, the university received its lowest scores for **Accomodation** (3), followed closely by **Facilities** and **Location** (both 3.2). Student life received a moderate rating of 3.4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Excellent marks are awarded for facilities and accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Student life and professors also garner strong reviews. However, the university's location is a significant weakness, scoring zero. Internationality is rated moderately, while value for money is excellent.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.24/5 from 46 reviews, students highlight strong academics and a vibrant community (~100% positive feedback). They praise supportive professors and diverse, driven students, enjoying a balance of rigorous studies and campus life.

Nothing to show

With a ~4/5 average rating, nearly all reviews praise the university's qualified staff and academic quality. Some mention challenges like course length and subject availability.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university is highly rated, with ~100% positive feedback and an average of 4/5 stars. Students highlight beneficial opportunities and recommend specific programs like fisheries studies. The university is noted as not being widely known.

Rating distribution
5★
41%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
41%
0%
60%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
17%
0%
20%
100%
100%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close