Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos - UNMSM vs Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - PUCP vs Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria - UNI vs Universidad de Piura - UDEP vs Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas - UPC
Side-by-side comparison from 36 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +University prestige and academic rigor
- +Diverse student body and personal growth opportunities
- +Accessibility and good teachers
- +Rich cultural environment and diverse activities
- +High quality of education and challenging academic programs
- +Excellent campus facilities and resources
- +Strong academic rigor and critical thinking development
- +Supportive community and positive campus environment
- +Quality infrastructure and experienced faculty
- +Strong academic training with emphasis on values and ethics.
- +Welcoming and peaceful campus environment fostering nature and connection.
- +Inclusive community with diverse backgrounds and humanistic approach.
- +Career-focused curriculum and expert instructors
- +Professional and personal growth opportunities
- +Diverse programs and cultural immersion
- +Practical learning experiences and quality study programs
- +Supportive and innovative teaching methods
- +Good infrastructure and administrative support
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- -administrative and management issues
- -outdated facilities and technology
- -lack of support and communication
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a persistent problem.
- -Lack of responsive and helpful administrative support.
- -Inadequate and outdated campus facilities.
- -Unclear or inconsistent communication from faculty and administration.
- -Financial burden of tuition fees.
- -Lack of transparency and communication regarding policies, procedures, and academic advising.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities, including insufficient study spaces and technology.
- -Bureaucratic administrative processes and unresponsive staff.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
This institution presents a mixed but generally positive rating profile. Its strongest areas are Professor quality (4.33) and Value (4). Conversely, Accomodation (2.67) stands out as the weakest aspect. Ratings for Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Internationality are all in the moderate range, around 3.67.
This institution boasts excellent ratings, particularly in its **professors** (4.75) and **student life** (4.5), alongside strong scores for **internationality** and **value** (both 4.5). Facilities also receive a positive mark at 4.25. The primary area for improvement, however, lies with **accommodation**, scoring a lower 3, and **location** at 3.75.
This institution demonstrates a robust offering, with its **Location** standing out as its strongest asset, earning a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, receiving a strong 4.5. Conversely, **Internationality** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, at 3.5. Other aspects like facilities, student life, accommodation, and value all received solid marks in the 4-4.5 range.
An impressive overall assessment reveals a university excelling across many facets. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional strengths in these core areas. The university also demonstrated solid value. However, its internationality score of 3.5 suggests this aspect could benefit from further development.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in student life and location, both receiving high scores. Internationality and value are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation and facilities present areas for improvement, indicating these aspects are less favorably perceived by students. Overall, the institution appears to offer a positive experience, with specific categories requiring more attention.
Overall, the university presents a consistent performance across most aspects. Its strongest areas are the quality of its professors and a vibrant student life and international community, both receiving solid 4 and 3.5 ratings respectively. Conversely, facilities and accommodation are identified as areas for improvement, each scoring a 3. The university offers a fair value proposition, also rated at 3.5.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise the university's prestige, solid education, affordability, and opportunities to meet diverse people. Some mention frustrating bureaucracy and infrastructure limitations.
Students praise the university's cultural richness, educational excellence, and diverse resources. The demanding curriculum is noted, fostering resilience. Some highlight the beautiful campus and ample student spaces.
All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a high academic level, strong foundational knowledge, and a positive university experience with good facilities and a supportive environment.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the integral training, high academic standards, and diverse extracurricular clubs. The peaceful, nature-filled campus and humanistic approach are also highlighted.
With a 4.22/5 average rating, ~89% of students praise diverse courses, excellent teachers, and strong career preparation. One review (~11%) mentions high tuition costs.
With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight strong communications programs, good study plans, and effective teaching. Areas for improvement include curriculum updates and expanded internship/job placement agreements.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
