Universidad del Magdalena - Unimagdalena vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC vs WSB Academy - WSB vs Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA vs Jakarta State Polytechnic

Side-by-side comparison from 43 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad del Magdalena - Unimagdalena (4.80)
Universidad del Magdalena - Unimagdalena: wins 7/7 categories
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC: wins 0/7 categories
WSB Academy - WSB: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/7 categories
University of Skövde: wins 0/7 categories
Semarang State University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Engineering
Best programme: General Medicine
Kraków, Poland
4.30
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Skövde, Sweden
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Semarang, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.96
Win
4.50
4.17
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.92
Win
4.50
4.33
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.81
Win
4.63
4.17
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.85
Win
3.88
4.33
Not rated
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.76
Win
4.00
3.50
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.92
Win
4.63
4.50
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.68
Win
4.00
2.83
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Innovative and inclusive environment
  • +High academic level and qualified faculty
  • +Comprehensive professional and educational advancement
  • +Strong social and community focus
  • +Early patient contact and practical skill development
  • +Student voice and equitable treatment
  • +Practical and career-focused learning
  • +Flexible scheduling and modern approach
  • +Experienced lecturers and useful information

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Frustrating administrative & management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engagement and uninspiring teaching.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
  • -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication from faculty and the institution is a significant problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university garners exceptionally high marks across the board. Its strongest areas are Facilities, boasting a near-perfect score of 4.96, closely followed by Location and Value, both scoring an impressive 4.92. Student Life is also well-regarded. The weakest area, though still strong, is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 4.68.

Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.

This university exhibits a strong showing in several key areas, with its **Value** and **Internationality/Location** receiving the highest marks. **Facilities** and **Professors** also score well. Conversely, **Accomodation** is identified as a significant area for improvement, with **Student Life** also ranking lower than other aspects.

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 26 positive reviews and zero negative, ~100% of feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight high academic levels, inclusive and innovative environments, excellent facilities, and strong faculty.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.

With 100% positive feedback, students praise practical, career-focused learning and flexible schedules. Recurring themes include experienced lecturers, useful information for work, and a modern approach with online options.

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
85%
56%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
15%
44%
67%
0%
50%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close