Instituto Universitario del Centro de México - UCEM vs University of Tuzla - UNTZ vs Eaton Business School vs Haute École Bruxelles-Brabant - HE2B vs Petroleum Training Institute - PTI
Side-by-side comparison from 105 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +High-quality, professional, and helpful professors
- +Good educational programs fulfilling expectations
- +Supportive environment and career prospects
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +High-quality, industry-relevant training
- +International exposure and practical learning
- +Strong reputation and employment prospects
Nothing to show
- +Excellent campus and facilities, particularly for design studies
- +Comfortable and well-equipped learning spaces
- +High-quality academic programs
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and organizational issues are pervasive.
- -Lack of practical application and outdated facilities are significant problems.
- -Some professors exhibit poor teaching methods and rudeness.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently mentioned.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring concern.
- -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
Nothing to show
Regarding university performance, professors and location stand out as the strongest aspects, both receiving ratings around 4.0. Student life and value are also well-regarded, scoring above 3.5. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, accommodation, and internationality, which are rated in the low 3s. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid but varied performance across these key metrics.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university excels in two key areas, earning a perfect score for Value and an outstanding 4.67 for both Facilities and Accommodation. Student life and location also score well, with both receiving 4.33. Professors and Internationality are rated a solid 4. The university's weakest areas are its teaching staff and its global appeal.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in its physical environment and academic offerings, reflected in strong ratings for facilities and professors. Location also received a favorable score. However, student life and accommodation fall into the mid-range. The university's weakest points appear to be its international inclusivity and perceived value, both scoring at the lower end of the spectrum.
Nothing to show
Around 46% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality staff and curriculum, with some noting occasional subjective grading. About 17% are negative, citing poor organization and lack of practical application. The average rating is 3.49/5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
All three reviews are positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average. Students highlight the institution's strong focus on dedication and perfectionism, international training, and practical, industry-standard approaches to engineering and science education, particularly in Oil and Gas.
Nothing to show
With a single review, the university receives a 4/5 average rating. The feedback highlights a positive campus experience, particularly noting excellent design studies and comfortable, well-equipped classrooms. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
The price for the master's is insanely expensive considering what it has to offer. I got an MA in translation and interpreting, but sadly, my colleagues and I barely had any practical exercises in these subjects. Most of the professors were alright though. Bearing in mind where they work, most of them try to do their best. The university is politicized, since the politicians play with it like with ping-pong balls. The only aim is to employ their own people, no matter how incompetent they are, instead of the people who are actually able to do proper work. Anyone in their right mind (since I was not one of those people) will opt to study abroad and obtain the MA degree somewhere else. I paid 2500 KM so I can have a degree from an XY rated university, instead of studying in, say, Germany or Austria, where the prices are identical, or even lower, and where students can also get real scholarships if they're good enough. Once again, a waste of money. If only they (politicians) invested all that money in infrastructure and better equipment, the university would be a much nicer place and the main Uni building would not have 40 YO doors and windows.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show