Mataram University - Unram vs Technical School Visoka vs Northern Illinois University - NIU vs HFU Business School vs Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences - CUHAS-Bugando

Side-by-side comparison from 10 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Northern Illinois University - NIU (4.50)
Mataram University - Unram: wins 0/6 categories
Technical School Visoka: wins 0/6 categories
Northern Illinois University - NIU: wins 6/6 categories
HFU Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences - CUHAS-Bugando: wins 0/6 categories
Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram: wins 0/6 categories
Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Kupang: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
DeKalb, Illinois, United States
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Architectural Engineering
Stuttgart, Germany
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Location
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
4.50
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse and complete study programs
  • +Improved facilities and infrastructure
  • +Strong graduate employability
  • +Engaging and supportive instructors
  • +Relevant and practical curriculum
  • +Collaborative and diverse community
  • +Supportive and engaging professors and staff
  • +Positive and inclusive campus community and social life
  • +Hands-on learning and research opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -The facilities are outdated and in need of renovation.
  • -The quality of teaching and curriculum is disappointing.
  • -Poor organization and superficial curriculum leave students unprepared.
  • -Lack of clear planning and a sense of no future perspective is disheartening.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution receives excellent marks in several key areas, with Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all rated a strong 4.5. Internationality and Value are also highly regarded at 4 and 4 respectively. The most significant weakness identified is its Location, which received a score of 0.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received a uniform rating. Consequently, no specific areas of strength or weakness can be identified, as all aspects—facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value—were assessed identically. The consistent scores suggest a uniform perception across these crucial university elements.

Demonstrating an outstanding overall performance, this institution receives top marks in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality, all at a perfect 5. Accommodations stand out as the sole area with a slightly lower, though still very strong, rating of 4.5. Value for money is also highly commended, reflecting a comprehensive and well-regarded university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 3.6/5, university reviews are predominantly positive (~60%). Students appreciate the diverse study programs and career prospects. A small amount of negative feedback (~20%) points to less than ideal facilities, though some improvements have been noted.

With an average rating of 2/5 from two reviews, feedback is predominantly negative. This single negative review highlights concerns about poor organization, superficial knowledge, and lack of preparation for future progression.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 2 reviews, feedback is 100% positive. Students praise friendly people, good Greek life, and helpful engineering professors.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
20%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
40%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
20%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close