emlyon business school vs Jean Moulin Lyon 3 - JML vs IAE Lyon School of Management vs ESSCA School of Management vs CEFAM Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 64 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: IDRAC Business School (5.00)
emlyon business school: wins 0/6 categories
Jean Moulin Lyon 3 - JML: wins 0/6 categories
IAE Lyon School of Management: wins 0/6 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/6 categories
CEFAM Business School: wins 0/6 categories
IDRAC Business School: wins 6/6 categories
Aura International School of Management: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: MBA Master of Business Administration
Best programme: Entrepreneurship
Best programme: International Business
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor in Innovation and Business Development Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
4.67
3.50
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.66
4.67
5.00
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.12
3.00
3.50
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.63
4.33
3.00
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.30
4.33
4.00
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.49
4.00
4.00
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.33
3.00
2.83
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +Practical application and industry relevance
  • +Diverse academic programs and extensive choices
  • +Supportive environment and accessible services
  • +Small class sizes and ideal study conditions
  • +Diverse guest speakers from academic and entrepreneurial backgrounds
  • +Focus on innovative learning and support for student initiatives
  • +International focus and diverse programs
  • +Experiential learning and networking opportunities
  • +Supportive professors and student community

Nothing to show

  • +Approachable and supportive professors
  • +Practical learning and real-world experience
  • +International environment and personal development

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Poor communication and unhelpful administrative staff are frustrating.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content feels irrelevant and not aligned with current industry needs.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies.
  • -Lack of support and irrelevant course content.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching and curriculum concerns are common complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -A lack of communication and support from the institution is prevalent.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

This institution shines with outstanding ratings in its facilities and location, both receiving a near-perfect score. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring above 4.3. However, the ratings indicate professors are the weakest area, with a score of 3, while the overall value is rated a respectable 4.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **Location**, achieving a perfect score, and a strong showing in **Student Life** with a 4. Its **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated moderately at 3.5. However, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** received the lowest scores, both at 3. Despite these areas for improvement, the university offers good **Value** at 4.

The university demonstrates considerable strengths, notably in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both earning a high rating of 4.5. **Student Life** and **Value** also score very well at 4.33. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area with a rating of 2.83. **Facilities** are rated at 3.5, and **Location** at 3.67, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

Nothing to show

Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated as outstanding. With a consistent five-star performance across every category, there are no discernible weak areas to highlight. The university demonstrates a uniformly strong offering.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

With a 3.67 average rating from 3 reviews, feedback is mostly positive (~67%). Students highlight strong academic programs and diverse educational opportunities. No negative reviews were submitted.

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is largely positive. Reviews highlight ideal study conditions, particularly within master programs, and a strong focus on entrepreneurial initiatives.

With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% are positive, highlighting international focus, experiential learning, and networking. Some note demanding workloads.

Nothing to show

Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise the program's fulfillment of expectations, approachable professors, practical learning, and strong industry connections. The international environment and focus on personal development are also highlighted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
0%
50%
33%
0%
100%
0%
4★
27%
67%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
10%
33%
50%
17%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Engaging

ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close