Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya - Unipasby vs State University Of Surabaya - UNESA vs Dinamika University - Stikom Surabaya vs Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komunikasi Almamater Wartawan Surabaya vs Darma Cendika Catholic University - UKDC
Side-by-side comparison from 6 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging academic events with qualified speakers
- +Opportunities for practical experience and learning
- +Supportive and well-facilitated campus environment
- +Accessible education and personalized course guidance
- +Supportive environment with caring professors and engaging teaching methods
- +Opportunities for extracurricular activities and hands-on experience
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Entrepreneurship integrated into all programs
- +Modern and well-maintained campus facilities
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration are frustrating.
- -Excessive workload and insufficient support lead to stress.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a persistent problem.
- -Inefficient administrative processes create significant frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency is a recurring concern.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of academic support are common complaints.
Across multiple metrics, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and internationality all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional quality in these key areas. The university's location and its perceived value for money are also highly rated, though these areas show slightly less perfection than others. Overall, the university presents a very strong offering with only minor room for improvement.
With a robust average score, the university demonstrates particular strengths in **Student Life** (4.25) and **Location** (4). Ratings for **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Professors** are also solid at 3.75. **Value** is well-regarded at 4. The **Facilities** category, while still decent, received the lowest score at 3.25.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. These reflect a highly positive experience in tangible resources, academic quality, and global engagement. The student life aspect, while still positive, is the weakest point at a score of 3, indicating potential for improvement in extracurricular offerings or campus community engagement.
With a 4/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight active campus events with highly qualified guests and provided food.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~75%), highlighting excellent and accessible education, supportive professors, and engaging teaching methods. Students appreciate guidance in course selection and opportunities for deep engagement. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights the university's strong focus on entrepreneurship and innovation, along with modern, well-maintained facilities supporting creativity.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show