Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya - Unipasby vs State University Of Surabaya - UNESA vs Dinamika University - Stikom Surabaya vs Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komunikasi Almamater Wartawan Surabaya vs Darma Cendika Catholic University - UKDC

Side-by-side comparison from 6 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universitas Ciputra Surabaya (5.00)
Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya - Unipasby: wins 1/3 categories
State University Of Surabaya - UNESA: wins 0/3 categories
Dinamika University - Stikom Surabaya: wins 0/3 categories
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komunikasi Almamater Wartawan Surabaya: wins 0/3 categories
Darma Cendika Catholic University - UKDC: wins 0/3 categories
Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya: wins 0/3 categories
Universitas Ciputra Surabaya: wins 2/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Arts
Best programme: English Literature
Surabaya, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
5.00
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
5.00
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Student life
5.00
Win
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
5.00
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging academic events with qualified speakers
  • +Opportunities for practical experience and learning
  • +Supportive and well-facilitated campus environment
  • +Accessible education and personalized course guidance
  • +Supportive environment with caring professors and engaging teaching methods
  • +Opportunities for extracurricular activities and hands-on experience

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Entrepreneurship integrated into all programs
  • +Modern and well-maintained campus facilities
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration are frustrating.
  • -Excessive workload and insufficient support lead to stress.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a persistent problem.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes create significant frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency is a recurring concern.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of academic support are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

Across multiple metrics, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and internationality all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional quality in these key areas. The university's location and its perceived value for money are also highly rated, though these areas show slightly less perfection than others. Overall, the university presents a very strong offering with only minor room for improvement.

With a robust average score, the university demonstrates particular strengths in **Student Life** (4.25) and **Location** (4). Ratings for **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Professors** are also solid at 3.75. **Value** is well-regarded at 4. The **Facilities** category, while still decent, received the lowest score at 3.25.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. These reflect a highly positive experience in tangible resources, academic quality, and global engagement. The student life aspect, while still positive, is the weakest point at a score of 3, indicating potential for improvement in extracurricular offerings or campus community engagement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight active campus events with highly qualified guests and provided food.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~75%), highlighting excellent and accessible education, supportive professors, and engaging teaching methods. Students appreciate guidance in course selection and opportunities for deep engagement. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights the university's strong focus on entrepreneurship and innovation, along with modern, well-maintained facilities supporting creativity.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
100%
75%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close