SRM University vs Christ University Bangalore vs Patrician College of Arts and Science - PCAS vs DG Vaishnav College vs Om Sterling Global University

Side-by-side comparison from 65 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: SRM University (4.30)
SRM University: wins 1/6 categories
Christ University Bangalore: wins 1/6 categories
Patrician College of Arts and Science - PCAS: wins 0/6 categories
DG Vaishnav College: wins 0/6 categories
Om Sterling Global University: wins 0/6 categories
Thiruvalluvar University: wins 4/6 categories
St.Peter's College of Engineering and Technology - SPCET: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Chennai, India
4.30
Top
Read more reviews
32 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Chennai, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology (Developmental and Educational)
Category ratings
Facilities
3.88
3.83
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
2.00
Location
3.47
3.69
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Professors
3.50
3.77
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Internationality
3.50
3.84
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
1.00
Student life
3.93
3.73
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.00
Value
3.88
3.77
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.00
Accommodation
3.81
Win
3.07
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and helpful, experienced professors.
  • +Excellent exposure through diverse programs and industry-aligned curriculum.
  • +Strong focus on placements and practical learning experiences.
  • +Strong academic curriculum and quality education
  • +Holistic development through internships and co-curricular activities
  • +Disciplined and structured environment with ample opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Kind and approachable professors
  • +Good study environment
  • +Well-designed marketing and business programmes

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Biased faculty and unfair grading practices.
  • -Poor campus life and lack of support for genuine talent.
  • -Strict rules and lack of freedom hinder student experience.
  • -Outdated curriculum and unhelpful faculty lead to poor academic outcomes.
  • -Administrative issues and poor management create a frustrating environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organization.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves strong performance, particularly in Student Life, with a rating of 3.93. Facilities and Value also score highly at 3.875. The university's Location, however, received the lowest rating at 3.47, alongside Professors and Internationality which both scored 3.5. Accommodations also received a solid rating of 3.81.

With the highest scores in **Facilities** and **Internationality** (both 3.83), this university excels in providing resources and fostering a global environment. It also garners strong marks for its **Professors** and **Value**. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.06, indicating an area that could benefit from improvement. Overall, the institution presents a solid academic and social offering with room for enhancement in student housing.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates strong internationality, receiving a perfect 5 out of 5. Key areas like facilities, professors, and student life are also well-regarded with 4-star ratings. However, the university's location and accommodation received a more moderate score of 3 stars, suggesting these aspects could be areas for development. Overall value is rated positively at 4 stars.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are predominantly positive, with an average rating of 4.34/5. Students praise the quality of education, helpful faculty, and good environment. A small portion (~3%) expressed concerns about campus life and faculty bias.

Approximately 84% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, holistic development, and good opportunities. Around 16% of feedback mentions rigidity and a lack of flexibility.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review is positive, rating the university 4/5. It praises kind professors but notes concerns about litter and difficult travel due to location.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
56%
19%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
28%
55%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
13%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close