Evelyn Hone College of Applied Arts and Commerce - Ehc vs Harris Stowe State University vs Midlands State University vs Supershine University vs Texila American University

Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Evelyn Hone College of Applied Arts and Commerce - Ehc: wins 0/2 categories
Harris Stowe State University: wins 0/2 categories
Midlands State University: wins 1/2 categories
Supershine University: wins 0/2 categories
Texila American University: wins 0/2 categories
South Europe College: wins 1/2 categories
Dovecot College of Nursing: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Education
St. Louis, Missouri, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Urban Planning
Best programme: Peace and Conflict Studies
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
East Bank Demerara, Guyana
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Best programme: MBA
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.00
4.38
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
5.00
5.00
4.29
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
4.00
3.82
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Student life
4.00
5.00
4.31
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Value
5.00
5.00
4.47
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
3.00
4.20
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Fosters growth and independence through challenging, self-reliant learning.
  • +Challenging yet comprehensive curriculum
  • +Caring and attentive professors
  • +Strong community integration
  • +Top-tier lecturers and strong academic programmes
  • +Diverse student body and international exposure
  • +Opportunities for growth and career preparation

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse student body and multicultural interactions
  • +Abundant resources and supportive lecturers
  • +Flexible, affordable, and accessible learning
  • +Supportive faculty and staff
  • +Valuable guidance and encouragement

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are significant drawbacks.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Lack of communication and unresponsiveness from staff are major complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -The curriculum is frequently perceived as irrelevant or too theoretical.
  • -Excessive administrative and management issues create constant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from instructors cause frustration.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for its professors and internationality, alongside a top rating for value. Student life and accommodation are also strengths, both receiving a solid four. Conversely, the university's location received a zero, indicating a significant area for improvement. Facilities also received a moderate rating of three.

The institution demonstrates exceptional strength in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for its professors, student life, and overall value. Conversely, its facilities and accommodation received moderate ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement. The university also scores well in location and internationality, suggesting a well-rounded educational experience with room for enhancement in physical resources.

This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance, with its **Value** and **Location** standing out as particularly high-rated areas. **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Professors** also received very positive scores, indicating a well-rounded experience. The **Facilities** are rated well, though slightly lower than these top-performing categories. The **Internationality** score represents the weakest area in this assessment.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its professors, location, student life, and internationality. However, its facilities received a zero rating, indicating a significant area for improvement. Accommodation and value for money are rated moderately, suggesting a balanced but not exceptional experience in these aspects.

Exceptional scores in several key areas highlight this institution's strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all received perfect marks, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. However, accommodation appears to be a weaker area, with a rating of three, suggesting room for improvement. This marks a generally very positive university profile.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives positive feedback, with one review rating it 4 out of 5 stars. This positive sentiment represents 100% of the feedback, highlighting a good learning environment that fosters independence and hard work.

The single review provided is highly positive, with a 4/5 rating. Feedback highlighted a challenging yet comprehensive curriculum, caring professors, and community involvement.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.65 average rating. ~94% of feedback highlights top-tier lecturers, a nurturing learning culture, and diverse student experiences. A small amount of feedback (~6%) notes challenges with accommodation security and booking policies.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive. Students highlight a diversity of international students and available resources. Admin staff are noted for needing improvement.

Both reviews are positive, with students appreciating flexible lecture times, affordability, and supportive staff and professors. The average rating is 5/5, reflecting ~100% positive sentiment.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
71%
0%
100%
100%
0%
4★
100%
100%
24%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close