Università Campus Bio-Medico - UCBM vs Aleksandër Moisiu University - UAMD vs École Supérieure d'ingénieurs d'Afrique Centrale vs University Institute of Great Schools of the Tropic - IUGET vs Douala University - UD

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Aleksandër Moisiu University - UAMD (4.70)
Università Campus Bio-Medico - UCBM: wins 4/7 categories
Aleksandër Moisiu University - UAMD: wins 2/7 categories
École Supérieure d'ingénieurs d'Afrique Centrale: wins 0/7 categories
University Institute of Great Schools of the Tropic - IUGET: wins 1/7 categories
Douala University - UD: wins 0/7 categories
University Institute of the Gulf of Guinea - IUG: wins 0/7 categories
Skyhigh University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Best programme: Sociology and Social Research
Best programme: Human Resource Management
Douala, Cameroon
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
4.67
Not rated
3.50
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Location
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.33
4.00
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
4.67
Not rated
4.00
3.67
4.50
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
4.33
Win
Not rated
3.00
1.67
3.50
Not rated
Student life
5.00
Win
4.67
Not rated
3.50
3.33
4.50
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.50
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
2.67
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Personalized attention from professors
  • +High-quality academic programs
  • +Active campus community and activities
  • +Practical application and real-world exposure
  • +High-quality teaching and qualified staff
  • +Effective and clear course content

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Adaptability and resilience fostered by challenging logistics
  • +Engaging learning environment despite resource constraints
  • +Community and student resourcefulness
  • +Excellent campus environment and facilities
  • +High-quality, expert faculty and rigorous academics
  • +Career-focused education and skill development

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of resources and ineffective teaching methods are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources negatively impact learning.
  • -Communication from staff and faculty is often unclear or lacking.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are consistently criticized.
  • -Lack of student support and unresponsive staff are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not adequately preparing students for future careers.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in facilities, professors, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. The university's internationality stands out as its weakest area, with a rating of 3. Location and value are also strong points, each rated 4, indicating a generally positive and well-rounded university experience.

This university garners excellent marks, with its Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value all scoring a remarkable 4.67. Location and Accommodation are also solid at 4.0. Internationality is a strong point, rated at 4.33. Overall, the institution excels in academic and student experience aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university's strengths lie in its prime location, receiving a high rating of 4.33. The student life and professor quality also score well, both above 3.3. Conversely, internationality is a significant weakness, with a score of 1.67, and accommodation is also rated low at 2.67. Facilities and overall value sit at a moderate 3.

This institution presents a commendable overall profile. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, include **Professors** and **Student Life**. On the other end, **Facilities** and **Internationality** are noted as comparatively weaker, though still solid with 3.5 ratings. The **Location** and **Accomodation** received strong marks at 4, while **Value** also scored well at 4.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the personalized support and professor investment in a small university setting.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight strong academic and practical learning, valuable internship exposure, and qualified, supportive staff. The Marketing Department and its teaching methods are specifically praised.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 3.33/5 average rating from 3 reviews, ~33% were positive. One positive review highlighted adaptability and resilience in navigating hall challenges. No negative feedback was provided.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.5/5, student reviews highlight a great experience. Recurring themes include a calm, neat campus conducive to studying, well-equipped facilities, and qualified, committed lecturers.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
67%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
4★
50%
33%
0%
0%
33%
50%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
100%
67%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close