Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena vs IT Online Learning vs École Supérieure d'ingénieurs d'Afrique Centrale vs University Institute of Great Schools of the Tropic - IUGET vs Douala University - UD

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University Institute of the Gulf of Guinea - IUG (4.50)
Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena: wins 2/4 categories
IT Online Learning: wins 0/4 categories
École Supérieure d'ingénieurs d'Afrique Centrale: wins 0/4 categories
University Institute of Great Schools of the Tropic - IUGET: wins 0/4 categories
Douala University - UD: wins 0/4 categories
University Institute of the Gulf of Guinea - IUG: wins 2/4 categories
Skyhigh University: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Sittingbourne, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Sociology and Social Research
Best programme: Human Resource Management
Douala, Cameroon
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Location
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
4.33
4.00
Not rated
Professors
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.67
4.50
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
1.67
3.50
Not rated
Student life
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
3.33
4.50
Win
Not rated
Value
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
2.67
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive professors and inclusive environment
  • +Abundant resources and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Excellent location and appealing surroundings

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Adaptability and resilience fostered by challenging logistics
  • +Engaging learning environment despite resource constraints
  • +Community and student resourcefulness
  • +Excellent campus environment and facilities
  • +High-quality, expert faculty and rigorous academics
  • +Career-focused education and skill development

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Terrible teachers and lack of continuous evaluation.
  • -Few electives and limited specialization options.
  • -Limited Erasmus destinations and few international students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are consistently criticized.
  • -Lack of student support and unresponsive staff are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not adequately preparing students for future careers.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Rankings for this institution reveal a mixed bag of strengths and weaknesses. The university excels in its **location** and **value for money**, both receiving a strong 4.5 rating. **Student life** and **internationality** also score well at 3.75. However, **professors** emerge as the weakest area with a rating of 2.5, while **facilities** are rated moderately at 3.25. **Accommodations** are a solid performer at 4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university's strengths lie in its prime location, receiving a high rating of 4.33. The student life and professor quality also score well, both above 3.3. Conversely, internationality is a significant weakness, with a score of 1.67, and accommodation is also rated low at 2.67. Facilities and overall value sit at a moderate 3.

This institution presents a commendable overall profile. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, include **Professors** and **Student Life**. On the other end, **Facilities** and **Internationality** are noted as comparatively weaker, though still solid with 3.5 ratings. The **Location** and **Accomodation** received strong marks at 4, while **Value** also scored well at 4.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 3.92/5, ~85% of reviews are positive, highlighting ease of integration, professor professionalism, and good facilities. A small portion (~7.7%) of feedback notes poor teaching and limited course offerings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 3.33/5 average rating from 3 reviews, ~33% were positive. One positive review highlighted adaptability and resilience in navigating hall challenges. No negative feedback was provided.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.5/5, student reviews highlight a great experience. Recurring themes include a calm, neat campus conducive to studying, well-equipped facilities, and qualified, committed lecturers.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
15%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
4★
69%
0%
0%
0%
33%
50%
0%
3★
8%
0%
0%
100%
67%
0%
0%
2★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close