BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs Stockton University vs Noroff School of Technology and Digital Media vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs Niger Delta University - NDU

Side-by-side comparison from 34 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Stockton University (4.50)
BI Norwegian Business School - BI: wins 3/7 categories
Stockton University: wins 2/7 categories
Noroff School of Technology and Digital Media: wins 0/7 categories
NHH Norwegian School of Economics: wins 2/7 categories
Niger Delta University - NDU: wins 0/7 categories
University of Agder - uia: wins 0/7 categories
University of South-Eastern Norway: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: B.Sc. in International Business Administration
Galloway, New Jersey, United States
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Accounting
Kristiansand, Norway
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.71
3.82
Not rated
4.00
Location
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.14
3.59
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.43
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
5.00
Win
3.50
Not rated
4.43
3.39
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.29
4.26
Not rated
4.00
Value
3.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.14
4.09
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
2.00
4.00
Not rated
4.71
Win
3.74
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong industry connections and practical business education
  • +International environment and balanced daily life
  • +Excellent and varied food options
  • +Welcoming campus and involvement opportunities
  • +Scholarship and aid accessibility
  • +Strong academic programs and career outcomes

Nothing to show

  • +Free tuition and diverse program options
  • +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
  • +Supportive environment and welcoming community
  • +Effective lecturers and supportive learning environment
  • +Dedication to academic excellence and student progress
  • +Opportunities for growth and improved infrastructure

Nothing to show

  • +strong technical and practical focus on systems
  • +sustainability and real-world application
  • +analytical thinking and problem-solving
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of student support are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or outdated.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
  • -Mandatory purchase of handouts or books from lecturers is a major issue.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsive staff are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

Impressive scores characterize this institution, particularly in its **facilities**, **location**, and **internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student experience is further bolstered by a commendable **student life** and a strong **professor** evaluation. However, **accommodation** presents a notable weakness with a score of 2, and the **value** proposition sits in the middle with a rating of 3.

This institution demonstrates strong performance across several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving 4.5 out of 5. Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation are also well-regarded, scoring a solid 4. Its weakest area appears to be Internationality, which received a rating of 3.5. Overall, the university offers a positive experience with notable strengths in its surroundings and student engagement.

Nothing to show

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in Student Life and Value, both exceeding 4.0. Professors also received a solid rating of 4.0. The university's Internationality ranks as its weakest area, with a score of 3.39. Facilities, Location, and Accommodations fall within a moderate range, suggesting areas for potential improvement to further enhance the overall student experience.

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at 4 out of 5. While professors and internationality are rated a respectable 3, these represent the weakest aspects of the university's profile. Overall, the university offers good value for students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

This university receives a strong average rating of 4/5, with approximately 100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight excellent industry connections, an international environment, and practical business education. The campus offers a balanced daily experience and diverse dining options.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight an open and welcoming campus with many involvement opportunities and scholarship aid. The educational quality and alumni success are also praised.

Nothing to show

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.

Most reviews are positive (~74%), highlighting academic excellence, dedicated lecturers, and a good learning environment. A small amount of negative feedback (~4%) mentions issues like forced handout purchases.

Nothing to show

The program is highly rated at 4/5 stars, with ~100% positive feedback. Students appreciate the focus on modern society's power infrastructure and systems. The curriculum emphasizes technical skills, analytical thinking, and practical problem-solving, particularly in sustainability.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
50%
0%
29%
30%
0%
0%
4★
100%
50%
0%
57%
39%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
14%
26%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close