BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs Northwestern State Medical University by I.I. Mechnikov vs Noroff School of Technology and Digital Media vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs RWTH Aachen Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
- +Clear career paths & job prospects
- +Supportive learning environment & engaging faculty
- +Relevant & practical curriculum
Nothing to show
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Robust, technically-oriented curriculum
- +Strong industry connections and networking
- +Modern facilities and international exposure
- +Welcoming international environment and modern facilities
- +Excellent research opportunities and advanced tools
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +strong technical and practical focus on systems
- +sustainability and real-world application
- +analytical thinking and problem-solving
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Negative professor attitudes and academic corruption.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues, including neglect and indifference, slow and inaccurate handling of student matters, and inaccessible alumni networks.
- -The university prioritizes tuition fees over student welfare and opportunities.
- -Concerns about unfair and potentially discriminatory contract practices.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently criticized.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often found to be subpar.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsive staff are common complaints.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving top marks. Conversely, its professors and internationality were rated moderately well. The university's value for money emerged as its strongest attribute, achieving the highest score. Areas for potential improvement are identified in professor quality and the international student experience.
Nothing to show
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
This institution demonstrates a solid performance across its surveyed aspects. Its strongest ratings are observed in Facilities, Accommodation, and Internationality, all scoring an impressive 3.83. Conversely, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value are slightly lower, averaging 3.67. This suggests the university excels in its physical resources and global appeal, while areas like academic instruction and campus experience represent opportunities for enhancement.
This institution garners high marks across most aspects, with outstanding facilities rated a perfect 5. Professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all receive a solid 4. The strongest area is clearly its facilities, while the other evaluated categories demonstrate a consistently strong, though less exceptional, performance.
This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at 4 out of 5. While professors and internationality are rated a respectable 3, these represent the weakest aspects of the university's profile. Overall, the university offers good value for students.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
This university receives overwhelmingly negative feedback, with 100% of reviews rating it poorly. The single review highlights issues with awful professors and unbearable corruption.
Nothing to show
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
Approximately 83% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong curricula, industry connections, and modern facilities. A small portion of feedback (around 17%) expresses concerns regarding student support and administrative responsiveness.
With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars, indicating a positive experience. The feedback highlights a welcoming international environment, modern facilities, and opportunities for research skill development.
The program is highly rated at 4/5 stars, with ~100% positive feedback. Students appreciate the focus on modern society's power infrastructure and systems. The curriculum emphasizes technical skills, analytical thinking, and practical problem-solving, particularly in sustainability.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
